超声脉冲反射法和激光吸收光谱法同步测量流动液膜厚度

苏明旭; Muhammad Abdul Ahad; 蒋永; 吴威; 杨荟楠

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20171251

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

超声脉冲反射法和激光吸收光谱法同步测量流动液膜厚度

流体力学与传递现象 | 更新时间：2025-12-10

- 超声脉冲反射法和激光吸收光谱法同步测量流动液膜厚度
- Synchronous thickness measurements of flowing liquid film on horizontal surface by ultrasonic pulse-echo and laser absorption spectroscopy methods
- 化工学报 2018年第7期页码：2972-2978
- 作者机构：
  
  上海理工大学能源与动力工程学院,上海,200093
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20171251
  中图分类号： K31
- 网络首发：2018-07-05，
  
  纸质出版：2018-07-05
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
苏明旭, Muhammad Abdul Ahad, 蒋永, 等. 超声脉冲反射法和激光吸收光谱法同步测量流动液膜厚度[J]. 化工学报, 2018,(7):2972-2978.

SU Mingxu, MUHAMMAD Abdul Ahad, JIANG Yong, et al. Synchronous thickness measurements of flowing liquid film on horizontal surface by ultrasonic pulse-echo and laser absorption spectroscopy methods[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, (7): 2972-2978.
苏明旭, Muhammad Abdul Ahad, 蒋永, 等. 超声脉冲反射法和激光吸收光谱法同步测量流动液膜厚度[J]. 化工学报, 2018,(7):2972-2978. DOI： 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20171251.

SU Mingxu, MUHAMMAD Abdul Ahad, JIANG Yong, et al. Synchronous thickness measurements of flowing liquid film on horizontal surface by ultrasonic pulse-echo and laser absorption spectroscopy methods[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, (7): 2972-2978. DOI： 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20171251.

摘要

液膜流动现象在工业过程中广泛存在，对流动液膜厚度测量方法的测量研究至关重要。首先利用已知液膜厚度的标准具（100～1000 μm）对超声脉冲反射法和激光吸收光谱法精度进行验证；结果表明，超声脉冲反射法测量液膜厚度的平均测量误差为1.07%，激光吸收光谱法测量液膜厚度的平均测量误差为1.29%。同时结合两种方法对流动液膜进行研究，结果表明，当液膜在低速/中速/高速流动时，两种方法测量流动液膜的平均厚度吻合良好，平均厚度差值分别为16.59、16.26、13.36 μm，流动液膜厚度的标准方差的相对偏差分别为0.29%、7.71%、25.37%，且在三种不同速度下两种方法测得在1s的周期内液膜波动次数一致。

Abstract

Because of common existence of liquid film flow in industrial processes

it's crucial to study methods for measuring thickness of moving liquid film. Measurement accuracy of both ultrasonic pulse-echo and laser absorption spectroscopy methods was validated by calibration standards of known film thicknesses (100-1000 μm). The coefficient of variation was 1.07% for ultrasonic pulse-echo method and 1.29% for laser absorption spectroscopy method. Then

thickness of flowing liquid film was measured by these two methods. The average film thicknesses were in good agreement for two methods when liquid film flow was at low/medium/high velocity. At three corresponding velocities

the difference of average film thicknesses between these two methods were 16.59

16.26 and 13.36 μm

and the relative standard deviation of film thickness was 0.29%

7.71% and 25.37%

respectively. Furthermore

both methods detected same number of fluctuations of liquid film within 1 s cycle at three different velocities.

关键词

Keywords

references

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于真空镀膜技术的薄膜热传感器实验

激光光谱法同步测量尿素水溶液液膜厚度与浓度

基于改性PVDF膜的新风全热回收特性研究

X65钢焊接接头在超临界CO2相及富H2O相中的腐蚀机理研究

基于LSTM动态修正一维机理模型的CFB机组NOx排放浓度预测方法