Modification of process and optimization for CO<sub>2</sub> capture systems using amine solution

LI Xiaofei; WANG Shujuan; CHEN Changhe

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2013.10.036

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Modification of process and optimization for CO₂ capture systems using amine solution

更新时间：2025-12-10

- Modification of process and optimization for CO₂ capture systems using amine solution
- CIESC Journal Issue 10, Pages: 3750-3759(2013)
- 作者机构：
  
  清华大学热能工程系, 热科学与动力工程教育部重点实验室, 二氧化碳资源化利用与减排技术北京市重点实验室,北京,100084
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2013.10.036
  CLC： K09
- Online First：05 October 2013，
  
  Published：05 October 2013
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
LI Xiaofei, WANG Shujuan, CHEN Changhe. Modification of process and optimization for CO₂ capture systems using amine solution[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, (10): 3750-3759. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2013.10.036.
DOI：

LI Xiaofei, WANG Shujuan, CHEN Changhe. Modification of process and optimization for CO₂ capture systems using amine solution[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, (10): 3750-3759. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2013.10.036. DOI：

摘要

采用一乙醇胺(MEA)进行燃煤电厂烟气脱碳是目前比较成熟和可行的技术

但是存在再生能耗高的严重缺陷。胺法脱碳系统流程改进及优化能有效降低再生能耗。应用Aspen Plus软件基于速率模型对传统胺法脱碳流程及其改进流程进行模拟研究。这些改进的流程包括吸收塔中间冷却流程、富液分流流程、贫液蒸汽再压缩流程、分流流程及富液分流与贫液蒸汽再压缩整合流程。研究结果表明:富液分流与贫液蒸汽再压缩整合流程节能效果最好

和传统流程相比再生能耗及等量功分别下降28.2%和11.9%。节能效果其次的是富液分流流程

再生能耗和等量功分别下降19.3%和11.8%。贫液蒸汽再压缩流程使再生能耗下降了14.1%

而等量功只下降了4.1%。吸收塔中间冷却流程和分流流程节能效果比较有限。

Abstract

Capturing CO2 from coal-fired power plants using monoethanolamine(MEA)solution is a relatively mature and feasible technology at present.However

high energy requirement is its main drawback.The energy requirement can be reduced by modification of process and optimization.A rate-based model in Aspen Plus simulator is used to simulate the conventional flow path and its modification.The process modifications include absorber intercooling

rich split

lean vapor compression

split flow and the combination of rich split and lean vapor compression.The results show that combination of rich split and lean vapor compression as well as the rich split are the first and the second best process improvement

save of regeneration energy and decrease of equivalent work are 28.2% and 19.3% as well as 11.9% and 11.8%

respectively.For lean vapor compression

save of regeneration energy can be up to 14.1%

while the decrease of equivalent work is only 4.1%.The absorber intercooling and split flow is relatively limited for energy saving.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

289

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Heat requirement for regeneration of a CO2 capture system using amine solutions

Sequential SO2/CO2 capture using CaO-based sorbents reactivated by steam

Recent advances in machine learning for modeling and control of crystallization processes

Thermodynamic study of germanium-impurity competitive deposition in GeCl4-MxCly-H2 system

Oxygen mass transfer performance of hollow fiber non-bubble aeration membrane based on gas/liquid-phase measurement method

Related Author

LI Xiaofei

WANG Shujuan

CHEN Changhe

陈鸿伟1

Related Institution

热科学与动力工程教育部重点实验室, 二氧化碳资源化利用与减排技术北京市重点实验室, 清华大学热能工程系

1电站设备状态监测与控制教育部重点实验室（华北电力大学）

⁰

Modification of process and optimization for CO2 capture systems using amine solution

DOI：10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2013.10.036

摘要

Abstract

关键词

Keywords

references

Modification of process and optimization for CO₂ capture systems using amine solution