Water to water heat transfer on shell-side of trisection helical baffle heat exchangers

董聪

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2012.03.007

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Water to water heat transfer on shell-side of trisection helical baffle heat exchangers

更新时间：2025-12-10

- Water to water heat transfer on shell-side of trisection helical baffle heat exchangers
- CIESC Journal Issue 3, Pages: 721-727(2012)
- 作者机构：
  
  东南大学能源热转换及其过程测控教育部重点实验室，能源与环境学院
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2012.03.007
  CLC：
- Online First：05 March 2012，
  
  Published：05 March 2012
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
董聪. Water to water heat transfer on shell-side of trisection helical baffle heat exchangers[J]. CIESC Journal, 2012, (3): 721-727.
DOI：

董聪. Water to water heat transfer on shell-side of trisection helical baffle heat exchangers[J]. CIESC Journal, 2012, (3): 721-727. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2012.03.007.

摘要

对倾斜角为10°、15°和20°的扇形折流板，倾斜角为15°的椭圆折流板和倾斜角为20°的轴向搭接扇形折流板三分螺旋折流板换热器以及弓形折流板换热器的传热特性和压降性能进行了测试试验研究，其中螺旋折流板全部采用分区布管结构，有48根管子，而弓形折流板换热器有49根管子。试验数据分析采用轴向Reynolds数Rez

o作为自变量，壳侧Nusselt数Nuo、轴向Euler数Euz

o等参数作为因变量，并采用Nuo/Euz

o量纲1组合数作为综合性能指标。在试验范围内，20°s方案的综合性能指标最高，比弓形折流板换热器方案平均提高69.8%；倾斜角最小的10°s方案的综合性能低于弓形折流板换热器方案；轴向搭接折流板换热器方案的综合性能低于相同倾斜角外圈连接折流板换热器方案，而椭圆折流板方案的综合性能低于相同倾斜角的扇形折流板方案。

Abstract

Experimental study was conducted in trisection helical baffle heat exchangers with three sector baffle schemes of tilt angles 10°

15° and 20°

an ellipse baffle scheme of tilt angle 15°

and an axial overlap sector baffle scheme of tilt angle 20°

in contrast to a segmental baffle heat exchanger. Each helix heat exchanger has 48 tubes with layout of one third division of shell cylinder for each baffle

while the segmental baffle heat exchanger has 49 tubes. The data of the shell side

Nusselt number Nuo

axial Euler number Euz

and comprehensive performance indicator Nuo/Euz

o are presented versus the shell side axial Reynolds number Rez

o. The results show that the heat exchanger with the scheme of periphery connected sector baffles with tilt angle of 20° has the best performance

whose average comprehensive performance indicator Nuo/Euz

o is 69.8% higher than that of segmental baffle heat exchanger

while the comprehensive performance indicator of the scheme with tilt angle 10°is lower than that of segmental baffle scheme. With the same tilt angle

the performance with the periphery connected connection baffle scheme is better than that with the axial overlap baffle scheme

and the performance with the sector baffle scheme is better than that with the ellipse baffle scheme.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

471

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Shell-side heat transfer performance of circumferential overlap trisection helical baffle heat exchangers

Thermodynamic performance of tower-type solar-assisted supercritical compression CO2 energy storage system

Prediction model for COD in petrochemical wastewater influent based on temporal-spatial dual-stream convolutional neural network

Zn-doped PdO/ZrO2 with rich oxygen vacancies for the synthesis of diphenyl carbonate from CO2 and phenol

Optimization of heat storage and release cycle performance of Ca(OH)2/CaO indirect reactor

Related Author

孙海涛

Related Institution

School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University

⁰