Alternative scheme and dehumidification and regeneration performance validation for economic multi-component solution

WANG Mu; YIN Yonggao; GUO Xiaoshuang; CHEN Tingting

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20181301

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Alternative scheme and dehumidification and regeneration performance validation for economic multi-component solution

更新时间：2025-12-10

- Alternative scheme and dehumidification and regeneration performance validation for economic multi-component solution
- CIESC Journal Issue S2, Pages: 420-424(2018)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 东南大学能源与环境学院, 能源热转换及其过程测控教育部重点实验室,江苏,南京,210096
  2. 中国建筑西南设计研究院有限公司,四川,成都,610000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20181301
  CLC： U831.6
- Online First：31 December 2018，
  
  Published：31 December 2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
WANG Mu, YIN Yonggao, GUO Xiaoshuang, et al. Alternative scheme and dehumidification and regeneration performance validation for economic multi-component solution[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, (S2): 420-424.
DOI：

WANG Mu, YIN Yonggao, GUO Xiaoshuang, et al. Alternative scheme and dehumidification and regeneration performance validation for economic multi-component solution[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, (S2): 420-424. DOI： 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20181301.

摘要

本研究旨在寻求更经济的替代单一溶液的多元溶液并验证其除湿再生性能。基于简单混合法则，预测多元溶液的配制方案。以空气出口含湿量作为除湿、再生性能的评价指标，搭建实验台进行实验验证。综合考虑除湿性能、再生性能和经济性，实验结果表明，43%、45%、48% LiCl/CaCl2多元溶液替代39% LiCl溶液作除湿剂，48% LiCl/CaCl2除湿性能略差，再生能力比39% LiCl提高了29.5%，再生能力最优，成本是39% LiCl的1/3，是最佳的替代除湿剂；51% LiBr/CaCl2多元溶液替代52% LiBr溶液作除湿剂，两者除湿能力相近，51% LiBr/CaCl2再生能力提高了50.8%，成本是52% LiBr的1/2，是很好的替代除湿剂。

Abstract

This paper aims to search for a more economical multi-component solution to replace single solution and validate its dehumidification and regeneration performance. A configuration scheme for multi-component solution is forecasted by simple mixing rule. Moisture content of outlet air is used as evaluation indexes. Experiments are carried out to verify the dehumidification capacity and regeneration capacity between single solution and multi-component solutions. 43%

45% and 48% LiCl/CaCl2 multi-component solutions are substitutions for 39% LiCl solution. 51% LiBr/CaCl2 multi-component solution is substitution for 52% LiBr solution. Taking dehumidification performance

regeneration performance and economy into consideration

48% LiCl/CaCl2 multi-component solution has 29.5% higher regeneration capacity than 39% LiCl solution and one third price of 39% LiCl solution. Since it has the best regeneration capacity

lowest price and slightly worse dehumidification capacity

it is the best substitute for dehumidifier. 51% LiBr/CaCl2 multi-component solution has 50.8% higher regeneration capacity than 52% LiBr solution. It also has similar dehumidification capacity to 52% LiBr solution and half price of 52% LiBr solution. It's a good substitute for dehumidifier.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Controlled synthesis of Bi2MoO6/MoO3 composite fibers via in-situ hydrothermal method and their high-efficiency photocatalytic hydrogen production performance

Effect of belt structure design on the vulcanization characteristics of all-steel radial tires

Mixed matrix membranes based on nitrogen-rich Schiff base network polymer and their CO2 separation performance

Study on performance enhancement and cold retention characteristics of solid packed bed cold energy storage

Analysis of flow field characteristics and mixing performance of different SK-type static mixers

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰