Optimal design of three phase fire-fighting foam formulation based on response surface methodology

JIANG Xinsheng; LÜ Kezong; WEI Shuwang; ZHU Liang

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161692

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Optimal design of three phase fire-fighting foam formulation based on response surface methodology

更新时间：2025-12-10

- Optimal design of three phase fire-fighting foam formulation based on response surface methodology
- CIESC Journal Issue 7, Pages: 2886-2895(2017)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 后勤工程学院军事供油工程系,重庆,401311
  2. 后勤工程学院国防建筑规划与环境工程系,重庆,401311
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161692
  CLC： Q028.8
- Online First：05 July 2017，
  
  Published：05 July 2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
JIANG Xinsheng, LÜ Kezong, WEI Shuwang, et al. Optimal design of three phase fire-fighting foam formulation based on response surface methodology[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, (7): 2886-2895.
DOI：

JIANG Xinsheng, LÜ Kezong, WEI Shuwang, et al. Optimal design of three phase fire-fighting foam formulation based on response surface methodology[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, (7): 2886-2895. DOI： 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161692.

摘要

为得到发泡及稳定性能优异的三相泡沫，响应曲面法优化设计三相泡沫灭火剂基础配方。通过单因素实验确定表面活性剂及固相粉体为SDS、Fc-134、6501、2000目（6.91 μm）合成云母粉，以发泡高度及稳定时间为响应值，研究其交互作用。利用Box-Behnken方法，建立的二次回归模型显著可靠，该模型预测SDS、Fc-134、6501浓度分别为2.64%，0.096%，3%，合成云母添加量为10 g时，为最优组合，预测发泡高度1533.86 ml，稳定时间12.8792 min，实验得到发泡高度为1550 ml，稳定时间为12 min，误差分别为1.05%，6.82%。与未优化三相泡沫比较在发泡高度及稳定时间分别提高14.8%、26.3%。结果表明，经优化设计三相泡沫发泡及稳定性能较未优化三相泡沫有明显提高且响应曲面法建立的预测模型误差较小，因此，该模型可用于提升三相泡沫灭火剂的发泡及稳定性能，为三相泡沫灭火剂配方设计提供参考。

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain three foam formulations of great foaming and stability based on response surface methodology. The factors of response were SDS

Fc-134

6501 and mica powder #2000 through signal factor experiments. Foaming height and foam stability were the responses to study the interaction. According to Box-Benhken method

quadratic regression model was established which was significant and reliable. Using the model to predict concentration of these reagents

the optimum concentration of SDS

Fc-134 and 6501 was 2.64%

0.096% and 3% respectively. The optimum dosage of mica #2000 was 10g. Under the optimum conditions

the predicted value of foaming height and stable time was 1550 ml and 12.8792 min respectively

meanwhile the experimental verification was 1550 ml and 12 min respectively. The error of these was 1.05% and 6.82%.Compared with un-optimized three phases foam

optimal design of three phase foam made improvement in foaming height and stable time which were increased by 14.8% and 26.3%

respectively. Results showed that optimal designed three phases foam has a greater performance of foaming and stability than the un-optimized one. The prediction error is small. It can be used for improving foaming and stability of the three phases fire-fighting foam

providing a reference for three phases foam formulation design.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

237

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Study on foam stability regulation and structure-activity relationship of mixed anionic/cationic Gemini surfactants

Foam separation behaviors of collagen-peptide based surfactant for treatment of dye wastewater

Stability of carbon dioxide foam and effect of polymer on its foam properties

Performance analysis and structural optimization of double-sided spiral groove-type dry gas seal

Methods of adaptive prediction and abnormal states traceability for sulphur content in flue gas desulfurization process

Related Author

BAI Yang

YAO Shushuang

XU Mengxu

ZHAO Jingyu

YU Fushun

ZHOU Shengpeng

TANG Yi

LIAO Xuepin

Related Institution

School of Resources and Environment Engineering, Shandong University of Technology

Shandong Key Laboratory of Intelligent Magnetoelectric Equipment and Mineral Processing Technology

Fuxin Higher Vocational College

College of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University

National Engineering Laboratory for Clean Technology of Leather Manufacture, Sichuan University

⁰