Comparison of purification of micropolluted source water by MIEX and PAC

YANG Xiaoming; ZHANG Zhaohui; WANG Liang; ZHAO Bin; ZHANG Min; GUO Xingfei; CAO Hongjie

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151311

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Comparison of purification of micropolluted source water by MIEX and PAC

更新时间：2025-12-10

- Comparison of purification of micropolluted source water by MIEX and PAC
- CIESC Journal Issue 4, Pages: 1505-1511(2016)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 天津工业大学环境与化学工程学院,天津,300387
  2. 天津工业大学省部共建分离膜与膜过程国家重点实验室,天津,300387
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151311
  CLC： U991.2
- Online First：05 April 2016，
  
  Published：05 April 2016
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
YANG Xiaoming, ZHANG Zhaohui, WANG Liang, et al. Comparison of purification of micropolluted source water by MIEX and PAC[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, (4): 1505-1511.
DOI：

YANG Xiaoming, ZHANG Zhaohui, WANG Liang, et al. Comparison of purification of micropolluted source water by MIEX and PAC[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, (4): 1505-1511. DOI： 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151311.

摘要

研究了MIEX和PAC两种水处理吸附剂对微污染水源水的水质净化性能。实验分别考察了MIEX和PAC对DOC和UV254的去除效率

并通过凝胶渗透色谱和三维荧光光谱分析

研究了MIEX和PAC对不同相对分子质量区间以及不同种类有机物的去除规律。在正常的吸附剂投加量下(MIEX 5~8 ml·L-1

PAC 30~50 mg·L-1)

MIEX对DOC和UV254的平均去除率比PAC高23%和20%。但随着吸附剂投加量的增加

两者去除效率差别逐渐减小

MIEX对DOC和UV254的最大去除率仅比PAC高6%~8%。与PAC相比

MIEX去除的有机物相对分子质量分布范围更广

特别是对中等分子量(5000~50000)有机物

其去效率明显高于PAC。MIEX对腐殖酸和富里酸类有机物的去除率略高于PAC

而对蛋白质类有机物的去除率则远高于PAC。动力学分析表明

MIEX和PAC对DOC的吸附去除过程符合准二级动力学

MIEX对有机物的吸附速率是PAC的40倍左右。

Abstract

Purification performance on micropolluted source water by magnetic ion exchange resin (MIEX) and powder activated carbon (PAC) was studied in this paper. Removal efficiencies of DOC and UV254 by MIEX and PAC were compared

respectively. The effluents of MIEX and PAC treatment were analyzed through gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and three-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy (3DEEM). The removal characteristics of organic pollutants with different relative molecular weights and composition were discussed. The results showed that under the normal dosages of the both absorbents (where MIEX was 5—8 ml·L-1 and PAC was 30—50 mg·L-1)

the average removal efficiencies of DOC and UV254 by MIEX treatment were 23% and 20% higher than that by PAC treatment

respectively. However

with increasing absorbent dosages

the maximum removals of DOC and UV254 for MIEX were only 6%—8% higher than that for PAC. Compared with PAC treatment

organic pollutants with wider range of relative molecular weight distribution was removed by MIEX treatment. In the range of 5000—50000

MIEX had a more excellent removal performance than PAC. On the other hand

a slightly higher removal of humic acid and fulvic acid was obtained for MIEX than PAC

but the removal of protein by MIEX was significantly higher than that by PAC. Kinetic analysis suggested that the adsorption process of both MIEX and PAC fitted the pseudo-second-order model

and the adsorption rate of MIEX was about 40 times higher than PAC.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

147

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

An assessment of life-cycles on solid amine for adsorbing low-concentration CO2 in confined spaces

An efficient CuCl@β adsorbent with high CO adsorption uptake and CO/N2 and CO/CO2 selectivities

Mixed-amine functionalized SBA-15 for CO2 adsorption

Analysis of flow field characteristics and mixing performance of different SK-type static mixers

Mixed matrix membranes based on nitrogen-rich Schiff base network polymer and their CO2 separation performance

Related Author

YU Qingni

SI Wenting

YANG Bin

ZHU Jingke

LEI Lecheng

HUANG Yan

YUE Yingyi

HE Liang

Related Institution

College of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University

China Astronaut Research and Training Center

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, South China University of Technology

Research & Development Center, China Tobacco Yunnan Industrial Co. LTD

Department of Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University

⁰