Effects of different preparation methods on structures and catalytic performances of AlOOH for methanol dehydration

WEI Rongrong; GAO Zhihua; HAO Shuhong; HUANG Wei

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20150002

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Effects of different preparation methods on structures and catalytic performances of AlOOH for methanol dehydration

更新时间：2025-12-10

- Effects of different preparation methods on structures and catalytic performances of AlOOH for methanol dehydration
- CIESC Journal Issue 6, Pages: 2112-2117(2015)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 太原理工大学煤科学与技术教育部和山西省重点实验室,山西,太原,030024
  2. 山西电力科学研究院,山西,太原,030001
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20150002
  CLC： 643.32
- Online First：05 June 2015，
  
  Published：05 June 2015
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
WEI Rongrong, GAO Zhihua, HAO Shuhong, et al. Effects of different preparation methods on structures and catalytic performances of AlOOH for methanol dehydration[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, (6): 2112-2117.
DOI：

WEI Rongrong, GAO Zhihua, HAO Shuhong, et al. Effects of different preparation methods on structures and catalytic performances of AlOOH for methanol dehydration[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, (6): 2112-2117. DOI： 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20150002.

摘要

采用完全液相、水热和沉淀法制备了4种不同的AlOOH催化剂

选用工业AlOOH(SB粉)作为对照催化剂

分别用XRD、NH3-TPD-MS、FT-IR、氮物理吸附和热重分析等方法对催化剂进行了表征并将其用于固定床甲醇脱水制二甲醚反应。活性评价结果显示

不同方法制备的AlOOH催化剂的甲醇脱水能力存在明显差异

完全液相法制备的催化剂经焙烧除炭后活性高

稳定性好

特别是有良好的低温催化活性

而沉淀法制备的催化剂活性低且稳定性差。表征结果发现

与γ-Al2O3不同

AlOOH表面拥有强、弱两种酸性中心

弱酸量相对较高的AlOOH催化剂具有强的甲醇脱水能力

较多晶格缺陷和晶粒度适中的催化剂有利于甲醇脱水能力的提高。

Abstract

In this work

four different AlOOH catalysts prepared by complete liquid-phase technology

hydrothermal and precipitation method are investigated and the industrial AlOOH(SB)is used as a control. These catalysts are characterized by XRD

NH3-TPD-MS

FT-IR

N2 adsorption-desorption and TG-DTG

and evaluated in a fixed-bed reactor for methanol dehydration. The results show that significant differences exist in these catalysts of methanol dehydration. The AlOOH catalyst prepared by compete liquid-phase technology followed by calcination for removing deposited carbon on the surface displays the highest activity and good stability

especially the performance in low temperature. On the contrary

the AlOOH catalyst prepared by precipitation method shows the worst activity and bad stability. Combined characterization results with catalytic performance

it can be found that the AlOOH catalyst has weak and strong acid sites

while γ-Al2O3 only has weak acid sites. When the content of weak acid sites is higher than its strong acid sites

the AlOOH catalyst shows better ability of methanol dehydration. On the other hand

more lattice defects and proper grain size of catalysts are beneficial to the improvement of the ability of methanol dehydration.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

542

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Alumina structure and surface property regulation for catalyzing methanol dehydration to dimethyl ether

Study on continuous alcoholysis of fructose to methyl lactate over TS-1 and In-TS-1

Design of cobalt-nitrogen-carbon/activated carbon rich in zero valent cobalt active site and application of catalytic oxidation of formaldehyde

Performance study of KOH modified carbide slag for removal of carbonyl sulfide

Thermodynamic performance of tower-type solar-assisted supercritical compression CO2 energy storage system

Related Author

LUO Li

CHEN Wenyao

ZHANG Jing

QIAN Gang

ZHOU Xinggui

DUAN Xuezhi

LI Bolong

JIANG Yuxi

Related Institution

State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology

Key Laboratory of Biomass Chemical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University

Institute of Zhejiang University-Quzhou

School of Chemical Engineering and Light Industry, Guangdong University of Technology

School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology

⁰