

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.中国科学院大连化学物理研究所,辽宁 大连 116023
2.中国科学院大学,北京 100049
3.华为技术有限公司,深圳 广东 518129
Received:29 April 2026,
Revised:2026-05-29,
Accepted:29 May 2026,
移动端阅览
HAN Runyi, XU Xiaofang, HUANG Jianxing, et al. Large language model-driven agents for molecular simulation: from automation to intelligence[J/OL]. CIESC Journal, 2026.
HAN Runyi, XU Xiaofang, HUANG Jianxing, et al. Large language model-driven agents for molecular simulation: from automation to intelligence[J/OL]. CIESC Journal, 2026. DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20260604.
传统分子模拟方法在处理化工、材料等复杂体系时,常受限于对专家经验的高度依赖、操作流程繁琐与结果可重复性差等瓶颈,难以满足高通量筛选与工业应用的需求。现有的基于脚本的工作流自动化方案虽实现了流程标准化,但其静态预设的执行逻辑无法应对模拟过程中出现的非收敛、力场适配偏差及采样效率低下等动态异常,缺乏自主的科学决策能力。近年来,大语言模型(Large Language Model
LLM)的引入为分子模拟提供了新的逻辑推理引擎与人机交互范式。通过构建集成自然语言指令、领域知识检索增强(Retrieval-augmented Generation
RAG)、模拟流程自动编排及代码自适应生成的智能体,实现了模拟任务从“静态脚本执行”到“动态自适应推演”的转变。本文综述了大语言模型赋能的分子模拟智能体最新进展,重点阐述了其在晶体结构自动构建、力场参数智能推荐、反应路径搜索、自由能计算流程优化及多软件协同仿真中的关键技术路径,分析了智能体在意图理解、复杂任务原子化拆解、全流程工具链编排及异常闭环修正等方面的应用实践,并展望了未来在多模态实验数据融合、基于主动学习的力场自主进化及可信计算框架方面的发展方向,旨在为计算化学与化工过程模拟的智能化升级提供理论参考与技术指引。
Traditional molecular simulation methods
when applied to complex systems in chemical engineering and materials science
are often limited by bottlenecks such as a high reliance on expert experience
cumbersome operational procedures
and poor result reproducibility. These limitations hinder their ability to meet the demands of high-throughput screening and industrial applications. Although existing script-based workflow automation schemes have achieved process standardization
their statically preset execution logic fails to address dynamic anomalies during simulations—such as non-convergence
force field mismatches
and low sampling efficiency—thereby lacking autonomous scientific decision-making capabilities. In recent years
the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) has provided a novel logical reasoning engine and human-computer interaction paradigm for molecular simulation. By constructing agents that integrate natural language instructions
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for domain knowledge
automated orchestration of simulation workflows
and adaptive code generation
a paradigm shift in simulation tasks from "static script execution" to "dynamic adaptive deduction" has been realized. This paper reviews the latest advancements in LLM-empowered molecular simulation agents. It highlights key technical pathways in the automatic construction of crystal structures
intelligent recommendation of force field parameters
reaction pathway searches
optimization of free energy calculation workflows
and collaborative simulations across multiple software platforms. Furthermore
it analyzes the practical applications of these agents in intent understanding
the atomic decomposition of complex tasks
full-process toolchain orchestration
and closed-loop anomaly correction. Finally
this review envisions future development directions
including multimodal experimental data fusion
the autonomous evolution of force fields based on active learning
and trusted computing frameworks
aiming to provide theoretical references and technical guidance for the intelligent upgrade of computational chemistry and chemical process simulations.
DeFever R S , Targonski C , Hall S W , et al . A generalized deep learning approach for local structure identification in molecular simulations [J ] . Chemical Science , 2019 , 10 ( 32 ): 7503 - 7515 .
Michel J . Current and emerging opportunities for molecular simulations in structure-based drug design [J ] . Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , 2014 , 16 ( 10 ): 4465 - 4477 .
De Vivo M , Masetti M , Bottegoni G , et al . Role of molecular dynamics and related methods in drug discovery [J ] . Journal of Medicinal Chemistry , 2016 , 59 ( 9 ): 4035 - 4061 .
Vergadou N , Theodorou D N . Molecular modeling investigations of sorption and diffusion of small molecules in glassy polymers [J ] . Membranes , 2019 , 9 ( 8 ): 98 .
Kee C W . Molecular understanding and practical in silico catalyst design in computational organocatalysis and phase transfer catalysis—Challenges and opportunities [J ] . Molecules , 2023 , 28 ( 4 ): 1715 .
Liu H , Jin Y , Ding H J . MDBuilder: a PyMOL plugin for the preparation of molecular dynamics simulations [J ] . Briefings in Bioinformatics , 2023 , 24 ( 2 ): bbad057 .
Thompson M W , Gilmer J B , Matsumoto R A , et al . Towards molecular simulations that are transparent, reproducible, usable by others, and extensible (TRUE) [J ] . Molecular Physics , 2020 , 118 ( 9/10 ): e1742938 .
Knapp B , Ospina L , Deane C M . Avoiding false positive conclusions in molecular simulation: the importance of replicas [J ] . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , 2018 , 14 ( 12 ): 6127 - 6138 .
Hjorth Larsen A , Jørgen Mortensen J , Blomqvist J , et al . The atomic simulation environment—a Python library for working with atoms [J ] . Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , 2017 , 29 ( 27 ): 273002 .
Horton M . Materials discovery screening with pymatgen [J ] . Nature Reviews Physics , 2023 , 5 ( 2 ): 76 .
Birkenheuer G , Blunk D , Breuers S , et al . MoSGrid–a molecular simulation grid as a new tool in computational chemistry, biology and material science [J ] . Journal of Cheminformatics , 2011 , 3 ( 1 ): P14 .
Di Tommaso P , Chatzou M , Floden E W , et al . Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows [J ] . Nature Biotechnology , 2017 , 35 ( 4 ): 316 - 319 .
Wei J , Tay Y , Bommasani R , et al . Emergent abilities of large language models [EB/OL ] . 2022 : arXiv : 2206 . 07682 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07682 https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07682
OpenAI , Achiam J , Adler S , et al . GPT-4 technical report [EB/OL ] . 2023 : arXiv : 2303 . 08774 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774 https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774
Ouyang L , Wu J , Jiang X , et al . Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback [C ] // Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 . 2022 : 27730 - 27744 .
Kumar P . Large language models (LLMs): survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges [J ] . Artificial Intelligence Review , 2024 , 57 ( 10 ): 260 .
Wang X H , Jiang H Y , Yu Y , et al . Building intelligence identification system via large language model watermarking: a survey and beyond [J ] . Artificial Intelligence Review , 2025 , 58 ( 8 ): 249 .
Xiao H G , Zhou F Z , Liu X Y , et al . A comprehensive survey of large language models and multimodal large language models in medicine [J ] . Information Fusion , 2025 , 117 : 102888 .
Yao S Y , Yu D , Zhao J , et al . Tree of thoughts: deliberate problem solving with large language models [C ] // Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 . New Orleans : Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation , 2023 : 11809 - 11822 .
Wei J , Wang X Z , Schuurmans D , et al . Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models [C ] // Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 . New Orleans : Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation , 2022 : 24824 - 24837 .
Taylor R , Kardas M , Cucurull G , et al . Galactica: a large language model for science [EB/OL ] . 2022 : arXiv : 2211 . 09085 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09085 https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09085
Wang L , Ma C , Feng X Y , et al . A survey on large language model based autonomous agents [J ] . Frontiers of Computer Science , 2024 , 18 ( 6 ): 186345 .
Boiko D A , MacKnight R , Kline B , et al . Autonomous chemical research with large language models [J ] . Nature , 2023 , 624 ( 7992 ): 570 - 578 .
M Bran A , Cox S , Schilter O , et al . Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools [J ] . Nature Machine Intelligence , 2024 , 6 ( 5 ): 525 - 535 .
Venugopal V , Olivetti E . MatKG: an autonomously generated knowledge graph in Material Science [J ] . Scientific Data , 2024 , 11 ( 1 ): 217 .
Statt M J , Rohr B A , Guevarra D , et al . The materials experiment knowledge graph [J ] . Digital Discovery , 2023 , 2 ( 4 ): 909 - 914 .
Wooldridge M , Jennings N R . Intelligent agents: theory and practice [J ] . The Knowledge Engineering Review , 1995 , 10 ( 2 ): 115 - 152 .
Xi Z H , Chen W X , Guo X , et al . The rise and potential of large language model based agents: a survey [J ] . Science China Information Sciences , 2025 , 68 ( 2 ): 121101 .
Qin Y J , Liang S H , Ye Y N , et al . ToolLLM: Facilitating large language models to master 16000+ real-world APIs [C ] // International Conference on Learning Representations . 2024 : 9695 - 9717 .
Shinn N , Cassano F , Gopinath A , et al . Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning [C ] // Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 . New Orleans : Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation , 2023 : 8634 - 8652 .
Sumers T R , Yao S Y , Narasimhan K , et al . Cognitive architectures for language agents [J ] . Transactions on Machine Learning Research , 2023 .
Durante Z , Huang Q , Wake N , et al . Agent AI: surveying the horizons of multimodal interaction [EB/OL ] . 2024 : arXiv : 2401 . 03568 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.03568 https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.03568
Wang R Y , Jansen P , Côté M A , et al . ScienceWorld: is your agent smarter than a 5th grader? [C ] // Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing . Abu Dhabi : Association for Computational Linguistics , 2022 : 11279 - 11298 .
Shen Y L , Song K T , Tan X , et al . HuggingGPT: solving AI tasks with ChatGPT and its friends in Hugging Face [C ] // Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 . New Orleans : Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation , 2023 : 38154 - 38180 .
Yang Z Y , Li L J , Wang J F , et al . MM-REACT: prompting ChatGPT for multimodal reasoning and action [EB/OL ] . 2023 : arXiv : 2303 . 11381 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11381 https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11381
Huang R J , Li M Z , Yang D C , et al . AudioGPT: understanding and generating speech, music, sound, and talking head [J ] . Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2024 , 38 ( 21 ): 23802 - 23804 .
Liu H T , Li C Y , Wu Q Y , et al . Visual instruction tuning [C ] // Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 . New Orleans : Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation , 2023 : 34892 - 34916 .
OpenAI . GPT-4o system card [EB/OL ] . 2024 : arXiv : 2410 . 21276 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21276 https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21276
Gemini Team , Google . Gemini 1 . 5 : Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context[EB/OL ] . 2024: arXiv : 2403 . 05530 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05530 https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05530
Wu S Q , Fei H , Qu L G , et al . NExT-GPT: Any-to-any multimodal LLM [C ] // Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning . Vienna : PMLR , 2024 .
Kojima T , Gu S S , Reid M , et al . Large language models are zero-shot reasoners [C ] // Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 . New Orleans : Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation , 2022 : 22199 - 22213 .
Wang X Z , Wei J , Schuurmans D , et al . Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models [EB/OL ] . 2022 : arXiv : 2203 . 11171 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.11171 https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.11171
Zhou A , Yan K , Shlapentokh-Rothman M , et al . Language agent tree search unifies reasoning acting and planning in language models [EB/OL ] . 2023 : arXiv : 2310 . 04406 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04406 https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04406
Yao S Y , Zhao J , Yu D , et al . ReAct: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models [EB/OL ] . 2022 : arXiv : 2210 . 03629 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03629 https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03629
OpenAI . OpenAI o1 system card [EB/OL ] . 2024 : arXiv : 2412 . 16720 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16720 https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16720
Sang J T , Xiao J L , Han J R , et al . Beyond pipelines: A survey of the paradigm shift toward model-native agentic AI [EB/OL ] . 2025 : arXiv : 2510 . 16720 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16720 https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16720
Schick T , Dwivedi-Yu J , Dessì R , et al . Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools [C ] // Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 . New Orleans : Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation , 2023 : 68539 - 68551 .
Kang Y , Kim J . ChatMOF: an artificial intelligence system for predicting and generating metal-organic frameworks using large language models [J ] . Nature Communications , 2024 , 15 ( 1 ): 4705 .
Gao Y F , Xiong Y , Gao X Y , et al . Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey [EB/OL ] . 2023 : arXiv : 2312 . 10997 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10997 https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10997
Zhao A , Huang D , Xu Q , et al . ExpeL: LLM agents are experiential learners [J ] . Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2024 , 38 ( 17 ): 19632 - 19642 .
Cai T F , Zhang N G , Li Y S , et al . Occam’s razor in AI-assisted complex diagnosis: a comparative effectiveness study of single large language models versus multi-agent systems in resource-constrained primary care settings [R/OL ] . 2026 . https://ssrn.com/abstract=6148075 https://ssrn.com/abstract=6148075
Maia E H B , Medaglia L R , Da Silva A M , et al . Molecular architect: a user-friendly workflow for virtual screening [J ] . ACS Omega , 2020 , 5 ( 12 ): 6628 - 6640 .
Gjerding M , Skovhus T , Rasmussen A , et al . Atomic simulation recipes: a python framework and library for automated workflows [J ] . Computational Materials Science , 2021 , 199 : 110731 .
Yekeen A A , Durojaye O A , Idris M O , et al . CHAPERONg: a tool for automated GROMACS-based molecular dynamics simulations and trajectory analyses [J ] . Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal , 2023 , 21 : 4849 - 4858 .
Ries B , Alibay I , Anand N M , et al . Automated absolute binding free energy calculation workflow for drug discovery [J ] . Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling , 2024 , 64 ( 14 ): 5357 - 5364 .
Schmitz G , Yönder Ö , Schnieder B , et al . An automatized workflow from molecular dynamic simulation to quantum chemical methods to identify elementary reactions and compute reaction constants [J ] . Journal of Computational Chemistry , 2021 , 42 ( 32 ): 2264 - 2282 .
Singh H , Raja A , Prakash A , et al . Gmx_qk: an automated protein/protein–ligand complex simulation workflow bridged to MM/PBSA, based on gromacs and zenity-dependent GUI for beginners in MD simulation study [J ] . Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling , 2023 , 63 ( 9 ): 2603 - 2608 .
Löhr T , Assante M , Dodds M , et al . Navigating the Maize: cyclic and conditional computational graphs for molecular simulation [J ] . Digital Discovery , 2024 , 3 ( 12 ): 2551 - 2559 .
Ieong P U , Sørensen J , Vemu P L , et al . Progress towards automated Kepler scientific workflows for computer-aided drug discovery and molecular simulations [J ] . Procedia Computer Science , 2014 , 29 : 1745 - 1755 .
Doerr S , Harvey M J , Noé F , et al . HTMD: high-throughput molecular dynamics for molecular discovery [J ] . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , 2016 , 12 ( 4 ): 1845 - 1852 .
Hayashi Y , Shiomi J , Morikawa J , et al . RadonPy: automated physical property calculation using all-atom classical molecular dynamics simulations for polymer informatics [J ] . npj Computational Materials , 2022 , 8 ( 1 ): 222 .
Gygli G , Pleiss J . Simulation foundry: automated and F.A.I.R. molecular modeling [J ] . Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling , 2020 , 60 ( 4 ): 1922 - 1927 .
Bayarri G , Andrio P , Hospital A , et al . BioExcel Building Blocks Workflows (BioBB-Wfs), an integrated web-based platform for biomolecular simulations [J ] . Nucleic Acids Research , 2022 , 50 ( W1 ): W99 - W107 .
Liu J X , Zhu T N , Ye C Y , et al . VASPilot: MCP-facilitated multi-agent intelligence for autonomous VASP simulations [J ] . Chinese Physics B , 2025 , 34 ( 11 ): 117106 .
Vriza A , Kornu U , Koneru A , et al . Multi-agentic AI framework for end-to-end atomistic simulations [J ] . Digital Discovery , 2026 , 5 ( 1 ): 440 - 452 .
Mendible-Barreto O A , Díaz-Maldonado M , Carmona Esteva F J , et al . DynaMate: leveraging AI-agents for customized research workflows [J ] . Molecular Systems Design & Engineering , 2025 , 10 ( 7 ): 585 - 598 .
Pham T D , Tanikanti A , Keçeli M . ChemGraph as an agentic framework for computational chemistry workflows [J ] . Communications Chemistry , 2026 , 9 ( 1 ): 33 .
Ghafarollahi A , Buehler M J . AtomAgents: Alloy design and discovery through physics-aware multi-modal multi-agent artificial intelligence [EB/OL ] . 2024 : arXiv : 2407 . 10022 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10022 https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10022
Zou Y H , Cheng A H , Aldossary A , et al . El Agente: an autonomous agent for quantum chemistry [J ] . Matter , 2025 , 8 ( 7 ): 102263 .
Campbell Q , Cox S , Medina J , et al . MDCrow: Automating molecular dynamics workflows with large language models [J ] . Machine Learning: Science and Technology , 2026 , 7 ( 2 ): 025037 .
Petković M , Menkovski V , Calero S . Towards fully automated molecular simulations: Multi-agent framework for simulation setup and force field extraction [EB/OL ] . 2025 : arXiv : 2509 . 10210 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.10210 https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.10210
Ding K Y , Yu J , Huang J J , et al . SciToolAgent: A knowledge-graph-driven scientific agent for multitool integration [J ] . Nature Computational Science , 2025 , 5 ( 10 ): 962 - 972 .
Zhang B H , Li X , Xu H C , et al . TopoMAS: Large language model driven topological materials multiagent system [EB/OL ] . 2025 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04053 https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04053
Wang Z Q , Huang H S , Zhao H C , et al . DREAMS: Density functional theory based research engine for agentic materials simulation [EB/OL ] . 2025 : arXiv : 2507 . 14267 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14267 https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14267
0
Views
6
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010102001995号