Prediction of solids dispersion coefficient in fluidized bed dense zone using CFD simulation
|更新时间:2025-12-10
|
Prediction of solids dispersion coefficient in fluidized bed dense zone using CFD simulation
CIESC JournalIssue 9, Pages: 2183-2190(2009)
作者机构:
东南大学能源与环境学院
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Online First:05 September 2009,
Published:05 September 2009
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
LIU Daoyin, CHEN Xiaoping, LU Liye, et al. Prediction of solids dispersion coefficient in fluidized bed dense zone using CFD simulation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2009, (9): 2183-2190.
DOI:
LIU Daoyin, CHEN Xiaoping, LU Liye, et al. Prediction of solids dispersion coefficient in fluidized bed dense zone using CFD simulation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2009, (9): 2183-2190.DOI:
Prediction of solids dispersion coefficient in fluidized bed dense zone using CFD simulation
The dynamic processes of solids mixing were obtained from the CFD-DEM simulations for two cases at different fluidizing velocities.The mechanisms of solids mixing in view of the particle and bubble scales were examined
and it was established that bubble movement through the bed
bubble burst at the bed surface and emulsion flowing downward induced by bubble rise played crucial roles in solids mixing.The kinetic theory based two-fluid model was used to simulate 2-dimensional fluidized beds with the width of 0.2 m
0.4 m and 0.8 m
respectively
covering regimes from bubbling to turbulent fluidization.Based on the simulation results from the two-fluid model
ideal tracing particles were used to track the solids phase movement
then according to these trajectories the average solids dispersion coefficients were computed.The results indicated that the lateral dispersion coefficient (Dx) increased with the increase of gas velocity
but it was greatly limited by the bed size.The axial dispersion coefficient also increased with the increase of gas velocity
yet was weakly limited by the bed size.The computational results agreed in the same order of magnitude with the values of Dx reported by different authors in the range of 10-4—10-1 m2·s-1 orders.The prediction established that the values of Dx in larger fluidized beds at a higher fluidizing velocity was much larger than that in small bubbling beds
which explained the discrepancy between the experimental values of Dx in the literature and the methodology for scaling-up solids dispersion rate in industrial fluidized beds.