Mass transfer performance comparison of two commonly used liquid desiccants
|更新时间:2025-12-10
|
Mass transfer performance comparison of two commonly used liquid desiccants
CIESC JournalIssue 3, Pages: 567-573(2009)
作者机构:
清华大学建筑技术科学系
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Online First:05 March 2009,
Published:05 March 2009
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
LIU Xiaohua, YI Xiaoqin, JIANG Yi. Mass transfer performance comparison of two commonly used liquid desiccants[J]. CIESC Journal, 2009, (3): 567-573.
DOI:
LIU Xiaohua, YI Xiaoqin, JIANG Yi. Mass transfer performance comparison of two commonly used liquid desiccants[J]. CIESC Journal, 2009, (3): 567-573.DOI:
Mass transfer performance comparison of two commonly used liquid desiccants
Mass transfer performance of two commonly used liquid desiccants: LiBr aqueous solution and LiCl aqueous solution was compared at the same solution temperature and surface vapor pressure. The heat capacities of the two desiccants were about the same at the same volumetric flow rate
while LiBr solution had a higher density and a smaller specific heat capacity. The key factors influencing performance were heat capacity ratio of air to desiccant and mass transfer unit
according to the analysis of the analytical solutions of heat and mass transfer processes. The change of mass transfer coefficient with air and desiccant inlet parameters was derived based on the experimental results. The mass transfer performance of LiBr solution was a little better than that of LiCl solution at the same desiccant volumetric flow rate within the experimental operating range.