CIESC Journal ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (5): 2033-2040.doi: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151517

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Selective inhibition of methanogens using 2-bromoethanesulfonate for improvement of acetate production from CO2 in bioelectrochemical systems

QI Yujiao1,2, BRIDIER Arnaud2, DESMOND LE QUEMENER Elie2, LÜ Fan1,3, HE Pinjing1,3, BOUCHEZ Théodore2   

  1. 1 Institute of Waste Treatment and Reclamation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
    2 Irstea, UR HBAN, 1 rue Pierre-Gilles de Gennes CS10030, 92761 Antony cedex, France;
    3 Centre for the Technology Research and Training on Household Waste in Small Towns & Rural Area, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of PR. China (MOHURD), Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2015-10-08 Revised:2015-11-26 Online:2016-05-05 Published:2015-12-03
  • Supported by:

    supported by the French Investissement d'Avenir Program (ANR-10-BTBR-02), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21177096, 51378375), and the 111 Program.

Abstract:

In this study, the specific reduction of CO2 to acetate in presence of methanogenesis inhibitor 2-bromoethanesulfonate (BES) was studied in a bio-electrochemical system (BES) via a two stage experimental design. During first stage using untreated mixed anaerobic consortia, the methanogenesis was dominated and the CO2 reduction yielded methane at the maximum rate of 0.95 mmol·L-1·d-1 at nearly 55.0% coulombic recovery. Sequences belonging to the family Methanobacteriaceae were dominant at the cathodic electrode. During second stage, BES addition selectively suppressed the growth of methanogens, which resulted in a shift of the dominant activity to acetogenesis with the maximum production rate of 2.22 mmol·L-1·d-1 with a recovery of 67.3% of electrons in acetate and hydrogen after two duplicates. The main populations were Rhodocyclaceae (15.1%), Clostridiaceae (11.9%), Comamonadaceae (11.1%) and Sphingobacteriales (11.0%). This study highlighted the importance of inhibition of methanogenesis to manoeuvre microbial structures, which decided the final product profiles during a microbial electro synthesis operation.

Key words: microbial electrosynthesis systems (MES), carbon dioxide reduction, acetogenesis, 2-bromoethanesulfonate (BES), methanogenesis inhibition, control, selectivity, boiprocess

CLC Number: 

  • TQ151.5+2

[1] RABAEY K, ROZENDAL R A. Microbial electrosynthesis— revisiting the electrical route for microbial production [J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2010, 8 (10):706-716.
[2] ROSENBAUM M A, FRANKS A E. Microbial catalysis in bioelectrochemical technologies: status quo, challenges and perspectives [J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014, 98 (2): 509-518.
[3] MARSHALL C W, ROSS D E, FICHOT E B, et al. Long-term operation of microbial electrosynthesis systems improves acetate production by autotrophic microbiomes [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47 (11): 6023-6029.
[4] NEVIN K P, WOODARD T L, FRANKS A E, et al. Microbial electrosynthesis: feeding microbes electricity to convert carbon dioxide and water to multicarbon extracellular organic compounds [J]. mBio, 2010, 1 (2): e00103-10.
[5] VAN EERTEN-JANSEN M C A A, TER HEIJNE A, BUISMAN C J N, et al. Microbial electrolysis cells for production of methane from CO2: long-term performance and perspectives [J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2012, 36 (6): 809-819.
[6] SOUSSAN L, RIESS J, ERABLE B, et al. Electrochemical reduction of CO2 catalysed by Geobacter sulfurreducens grown on polarized stainless steel cathodes [J]. Electrochemistry Communications, 2013: 2827-2830.
[7] LOVLEY D R. Powering microbes with electricity: direct electron transfer from electrodes to microbes [J]. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 2011, 3 (1):27-35.
[8] NEVIN K P, HENSLEY S A, FRANKS A E, et al. Electrosynthesis of organic compounds from carbon dioxide is catalyzed by a diversity of acetogenic microorganisms [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2011, 77 (9): 2882-2886.
[9] SONG J, KIM Y, LIM M, et al. Microbes as electrochemical CO2 conversion catalysts [J]. ChemSuschem, 2011, 4 (5): 587-590.
[10] MARSHALL C W, ROSS D E, FICHOT E B, et al. Electrosynthesis of commodity chemicals by an autotrophic microbial community [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2012,78 (23): 8412-8420.
[11] WANG Z, LEARY D H, MALANOSKI A P, et al. A previously uncharacterized, nonphotosynthetic member of the chromatiaceae is the primary CO2-fixing constituent in a self-regenerating biocathode [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2015, 81 (2): 699-712.
[12] JIANG Y, SU M, ZHANG Y, et al. Bioelectrochemical systems for simultaneously production of methane and acetate from carbon dioxide at relatively high rate [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38 (8): 3497-3502.
[13] JOURDIN L, FREGUIA S, DONOSE B C, et al. A novel carbon nanotube modified scaffold as an efficient biocathode material for improved microbial electrosynthesis [J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2014, 2 (32): 13093-13102.
[14] ZAYBAK Z, PISCIOTTA J M, TOKASH J C, et al. Enhanced start-up of anaerobic facultatively autotrophic biocathodes in bioelectrochemical systems [J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2013, 168 (4): 478-485.
[15] KOTSYURBENKO O R, GLAGOLEV M V, NOZHEVNIKOVA A N, et al. Competition between homoacetogenic bacteria and methanogenic archaea for hydrogen at low temperature [J]. Fems Microbiology Ecology, 2001, 38 (2-3): 153-159.
[16] CHAE K J, CHOI M J, KIM K Y, et al. Selective inhibition of methanogens for the improvement of biohydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35 (24): 13379-13386.
[17] CALL D, LOGAN B E. Hydrogen production in a single chamber microbial electrolysis cell lacking a membrane [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42 (9): 3401-3406.
[18] WANG A J, LIU W Z, CHENG S A, et al. Source of methane and methods to control its formation in single chamber microbial electrolysis cells [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34 (9): 3653-3658.
[19] HOU Y P, LUO H P, LIU G L, et al. Improved hydrogen production in the microbial electrolysis cell by inhibiting methanogenesis using ultraviolet irradiation [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48 (17): 10482-10488.
[20] LIU H, WANG J, WANG A J, et al. Chemical inhibitors of methanogenesis and putative applications [J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2011, 89 (5): 1333-1340.
[21] ZHUANG L, CHEN Q, ZHOU S G, et al. Methanogenesis control using 2-bromoethanesulfonate for enhanced power recovery from sewage sludge in air-cathode microbial fuel cells [J]. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 2012, 7 (7): 6512-6523.
[22] ZHU H G, BELAND M. Evaluation of alternative methods of preparing hydrogen producing seeds from digested wastewater sludge [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2006, 31 (14): 1980-1988.
[23] SU M, JIANG Y, LI D. Production of acetate from carbon dioxide in bioelectrochemical systems based on autotrophic mixed culture [J]. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2013, 23 (8): 1140-1146.
[24] EDGAR R C, HAAS B J, CLEMENTE J C, et al. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection [J]. Bioinformatics, 2011, 27 (16): 2194-2200.
[25] CAPORASO J G, KUCZYNSKI J, STOMBAUGH J, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data [J]. Nature Methods, 2010,7 (5): 335-336.
[26] QUAST C, PRUESSE E, YILMAZ P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools [J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2013, 41 (D1): D590-D596.
[27] MODESTRA J A, NAVANEETH B, MOHAN S V. Bio-electrocatalytic reduction of CO2: enrichment of homoacetogens and pH optimization towards enhancement of carboxylic acids biosynthesis [J]. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2015, 10: 78-87.
[28] PATIL S A, ARENDS J B A, VANWONTERGHEM I, et al. Selective enrichment establishes a stable performing community for microbial electrosynthesis of acetate from CO2 [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49 (14): 8833-8843.
[29] BAJRACHARYA S, TER HEIJNE A, BENETTON X D, et al. Carbon dioxide reduction by mixed and pure cultures in microbial electrosynthesis using an assembly of graphite felt and stainless steel as a cathode [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 195: 14-24.
[30] CHENG S A, XING D F, CALL D F, et al. Direct biological conversion of electrical current into methane by electromethanogenesis [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43 (10): 3953-3958.
[31] LEE C, KIM J, SHIN S G, et al. Monitoring bacterial and archaeal community shifts in a mesophilic anaerobic batch reactor treating a high-strength organic wastewater [J]. Fems Microbiology Ecology, 2008, 65 (3): 544-554.
[32] DIEKERT G, WOHLFARTH G. Metabolism of homoacetogens [J]. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek International Journal of General and Molecular Microbiology, 1994, 66 (1/2/3): 209-221.
[33] KOPKE M, HELD C, HUJER S, et al. Clostridium ljungdahlii represents a microbial production platform based on syngas [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107 (29): 13087-13092.
[34] ABRINI J, NAVEAU H, NYNS E J. Clostridium autoethanogenum, sp. nov, an anaerobic bacterium that produces ethanol from carbon-monoxide [J]. Archives of Microbiology, 1994, 161 (4): 345-351.
[35] LIOU J S C, BALKWILL D L, DRAKE G R, et al. Clostridium carboxidivorans sp nov., a solvent-producing clostridium isolated from an agricultural settling lagoon, and reclassification of the acetogen Clostridium scatologenes strain SL1 as Clostridium drakei sp nov. [J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2005, 55: 2085-2091.
[36] WILLEMS A, BUSSE J, GOOR M, et al. Hydrogenophaga, a new genus of hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria that includes Hydrogenophaga- flava comb. nov. (formerly pseudomonas-flava), Hydrogenophaga-Palleronii (formerly Pseudomonas palleronii), Hydrogenophaga Pseudoflava (formerly Pseudomonas pseudoflava and “Pseudomonas- carboxydoflava”), and Hydrogenophaga taeniospiralis (formerly Pseudomonas taeniospiralis) [J]. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 1989, 39 (3): 319-333.
[37] THRASH J C, VAN TRUMP J I, WEBER K A, et al. Electrochemical stimulation of microbial perchlorate reduction [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41 (5): 1740-1746.
[38] SHEHAB N, LI D, AMY G L, et al. Characterization of bacterial and archaeal communities in air-cathode microbial fuel cells, open circuit and sealed-off reactors [J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2013, 97 (22):9885-9895.
[39] REINHOLDHUREK B, HUREK T, GILLIS M, et al. Azoarcus gen. nov., nitrogen-fixing proteobacteria associated with roots of kallar grass (Leptochloa fusca (L.) Kunth), and description of two species, Azoarcus indigens sp. nov. and Azoarcus communis sp. nov. [J]. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 1993, 43 (3): 574-584.
[40] WARREN Y A, CITRON D M, MERRIAM C V, et al. Biochemical differentiation and comparison of desulfovibrio species and other phenotypically similar genera [J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2005, 43 (8): 4041-4045.

[1] ZHANG Zhigang, ZHANG Debiao, ZHANG Qinqin, ZHANG Tao, YANG Ru, LI Wenxiu. Screening of ionic liquids for separation of ethyl acetate-acetonitrile azeotrope based on COSMO-RS [J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(1): 146-153.
[2] CUI Yanqi. Research on development of composite phase change humidity-control material in buildings [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(S1): 1-7.
[3] WANG Xueliang, LI Hongguang. Artificial affective neural networks with applications [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(S1): 80-86.
[4] LUO Lin, YANG Bo, LI Hongguang. A dynamic multi-attribute decision making approach to industrial process control performance evaluations [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(S1): 87-94.
[5] LI Jia, GU Jinghua, YIN Wenjie, LI Zeyao. Preparation of ZIF-8 membranes on ZnO modified stainless steel nets [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(8): 3724-3731.
[6] YANG Qing, YANG Yubing, LI Jianmin, FENG Hongli, ZHOU Xueyang, LIU Xiuhong. Partial nitrification coupled anaerobic ammonia oxidation process to treat low C/N domestic sewage [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(8): 3635-3642.
[7] HUANG Pan, LIU Zhen, SHAO Yunqi, DENG Shifeng, LIU Boping. Influences of organic additives on inhibiting by-products in zinc-catalyzed synthesis of alkynylsilane [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(7): 2993-3000.
[8] WANG Zhanwei, WANG Lin, LIANG Kunfeng, YUAN Junfei, WANG Zhiwei. Chiller fault diagnosis based on fusional Bayesian network [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(7): 3167-3173.
[9] FENG Liwei, ZHANG Cheng, LI Yuan, XIE Yanhong. DLNS-PCA-based fault detection for multimode batch process [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(7): 3159-3166.
[10] PU Ge, DU Jiantai, ZHANG Zhang, ZHANG Dinghai, WU Bang, HUANG Beibei, ZHU Tuanhui. Experimental study of selective non-catalytic reduction process with methylamine as reducing agent [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(7): 3234-3241.
[11] LI Yonggang, MA Lei, WU Tiebin, ZHU Hongqiu, YANG Chunhua. pH optimization and control in iron removal process of multi-reactor cascade [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(6): 2586-2593.
[12] WU Yuxiang, WANG Xinhui, CHAI Kungang, LIN Guoyou, ZHAO Zhenxia, ZHAO Zhongxing. Oxidized modification of novel silkworm excrement-based porous biocarbon with various acids for sustained release of pesticide thiamethoxam [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(6): 2797-2804.
[13] ZHANG Jianli, WANG Xu, MA Liping, YU Xufei, MA Qingxiang, FAN Subing, ZHAO Tiansheng. Preparation of modified MgFeMn-HTLcs and catalytic performance in CO hydrogenation [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(5): 2073-2080.
[14] CHENG Ben'ai, JIA Hui, YANG Guang, LIU Wenbin, ZHANG Hongwei, WANG Jie. Analysis of synergistic effects of process factors on energy distribution in MFCs [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(5): 2242-2249.
[15] ZHAO Shuwei, HE Tao, LI Xuemei, GAO Congjie, HO Kyong Shon, NGHIEM Long D, ELIMELECH Menachem. Highlights of international forward osmosis technology symposium (IFOS2016): is forward osmosis feasible? [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(4): 1255-1260.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!