CIESC Journal ›› 2014, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (9): 3592-3598.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.09.038

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Numerical simulation of coal pyrolysis using FD model

YU Junwu, CHEN Yongli, HE Rong, ZHANG Yanguo   

  1. Key Laboratory of Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2014-01-06 Revised:2014-04-04 Online:2014-09-05
  • Supported by:

    supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21376134).

Abstract: For numerical simulation of coal pyrolysis using the fragmentation and diffusionn (FD) model, a numerical method was proposed. The pyrolysis of three kinds of coal in a heated-tube reactor was simulated respectively, and the results were compared with the experimental results and also with the numerical results of FG-DVC model and CPD model. The effect of pyrolysis temperature and particle diameter on coal pyrolysis product was also studied. The accuracy of FD model was higher than FG-DVC model and CPD model, proving that FD model was more applicable for numerical simulation of coal pyrolysis. The gas product increased rapidly by increasing pyrolysis temperature until 1373 K, and then was nearly constant when pyrolysis temperature was higher than 1373 K. The tar product decreased with increasing pyrolysis temperature, and less time was needed to reach the maximum tar amount. The gas product and tar product both decreased by increasing particle diameter of coal, while more time was needed to reach the maximum tar amount.

Key words: coal, pyrolysis, model, numerical simulation, Euler-Lagrangian method

CLC Number: 

  • TK16
[1] Xie Jianjun (谢建军), Yang Xuejun (杨学军), Lü Xuesong (吕雪松), et al. Progress on transformation behavior of sulfur and nitrogen during coal pyrolysis [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress (化学进展), 2004, 23 (11): 1214-1218
[2] Solomon P R, Beer J M, Longwell J P. Fundamentals of coal conversion and relation to coal properties [J]. Energy & Fuels, 1987, 12 (7): 837-883
[3] Solomon P R, Fletcher T H, Pugmire R J. Progress in coal pyrolysis [J]. Fuel, 1993, 72 (4): 587-597
[4] Solomon P R, David G Hamblen, Michael A Serio, et al. A character method and model for predicting coal conversion behavior [J]. Fuel, 1993, 72 (4): 469-488
[5] Yu Jianglong, Lucas John A, Wall Terry F. Formation of the structure of chars during devolatilization of pulverized coal and its thermal properties: a review [J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2007, 33 (2): 135-170
[6] Chen Qun (陈群). Study on the fractal pore structure and combustion kinetics of chars [D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2004
[7] Wang Xiaoliang (王晓亮). Evolution of porous fractal properties during coal devolatilization and study of coal pyrolysis model [D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2007
[8] Hu Guoxin (胡国新), Luo Zhongyang (骆仲泱), Shen Luochan (沈珞婵), et al. Fractal concepts in modelling of char gasification [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China) (化工学报), 1997, 48 (4): 457-464
[9] Anthony D B, Howard J B, Hottel H C, et al. Rapid devolatilization of pulverized coal//15th Symposium (International) on Combustion [C]. Pittsburg: the Combustion Institute, 1975: 1303-1317
[10] Anthony D B, Howard J B. Coal devolatilization and hydrogastification [J]. AIChE Journal, 1976, 22 (4): 625-656
[11] Howard J B. Fundamentals of coal pyrolysis and hydropyrolysis// Elliott M A. Chemistry of Coal Utilization [M]. New York: Willey, 1981: 322-324
[12] Suuberg E M, Peters W A, Howard J B. Product compositions and formation kinetics in rapid pyrolysis of pulverized coal-implications for combustion//Proceedings of the 17th International Combustion Symposium [C]. Pittsburg: the Combustion Institute, 1979: 117-130
[13] Kobayashi H, Howard J B, Sarofim A F. Coal devolatilization at high temperatures//16th Symposium (International) on Combustion [C]. Pittsburg: the Combustion Institute, 1977: 411-415
[14] Pitt G J. The kinetics of the evolution of volatile produce from coal [J]. Fuel, 1962, 41: 267-282
[15] Fu Weibiao (傅维标), Zhang Yanping (张燕屏), Han Hongqiao (韩洪樵), et al. Common pyrolysis model for coal particle (Fu-Zhang model) [J]. Science in China, Ser. A (中国科学, A辑), 1988, 12: 1283-1290
[16] Jin Weilong (金渭龙), Wang Yifei (王亦飞), Peng Kang (彭康), et al. Numerical simulation analysis of novel two-stage gasifier [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2012, 63 (12): 3747-3755
[17] Solomon P R, Hamblen D G, Carangelo R M, et al. General model of coal devolatilization [J]. Energy & Fuels, 1988, 2 (3): 405-422
[18] Solomon P R, Serion M A, Hamblen D G, et al. Advances in the FG-DVC model of coal devolatilization [J]. Preprint. Am. Chem. Sci., Div. Fuel Chem., 1990, 35 (2): 479-488
[19] Grant D M, Pugmire R J, Fletcher T H, et al. Chemical model of coal devolatilization using percolation lattice statistics [J]. Energy & Fuels, 1989, 3 (2): 175-186
[20] Fletcher T H, Kersteun A R, Pugmire R J, et al. Chemical percolation model for devolatilization (Ⅱ): Temperature and heating rate effects on product yields [J]. Energy & Fuels, 1990, 4 (1): 54-60
[21] Fletcher T H, Kersteun A R, Pugmire R J, et al. Chemical percolation model for devolatilization (Ⅲ): Direct use of 13C NMR data to predict effects of coal type [J]. Energy & Fuels, 1992, 6 (4): 414-431
[22] Chen Yongli, He Rong. Fragmentation and diffusion model for coal pyrolysis [J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2011, 90 (1): 72-79
[23] Dominic B Genetti. An advanced model of coal devolatilization based on chemical structure [D]. Utah: Brigham Young University, 1999
[24] Cui Z, Liu K, Fletcher T H. Coal gasification//H2 and Syngas Production and Purification Technologies [M]. New Jersey: AIChE and Wiley, 2010: 156-218
[25] Chen Yongli (陈永利). Study of FD coal pyrolysis model and the effect of gas diffusion in fractal pores on coal pyrolysis [D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2011
[26] Li Ruhui (李汝辉). Fundamental of Mass Transfer (传质学基础) [M]. Beijing: Beihang University Press, 1987: 47-57
[27] Solomon P R, Serio M A, Robert M C, et al. Very rapid coal pyrolysis [J]. Fuel, 1986, 65 (2): 182-194
[28] Yang Haiping (杨海平), Chen Hanping (陈汉平), Ju Fudong (鞠付栋), et al. Influence of temperature on coal pyrolysis and char gasification [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE (中国电机工程学报), 2008, 28 (8): 40-45
[29] Yuan Shuai (袁帅), Chen Xueli (陈雪莉), Li Jun (李军), et al. Formations of solid and gas phase products during rapid pyrolysis of coal [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2011, 62 (5): 1382-1388
[30] Zhang Cuizhen (张翠珍), Yi Xiaoqing (衣晓青), Liu Liang (刘亮). Study on pyrolysis character and pyrolysis reaction dynamics of coal [J]. Thermal Power Generation (热力发电), 2006, 35 (4): 17-20
[31] Anthony D B. Rapid devolatilization and hydrogasification of pulverized coal [D]. Cambridge: MIT, 1974
[1] ZHANG Zhigang, ZHANG Debiao, ZHANG Qinqin, ZHANG Tao, YANG Ru, LI Wenxiu. Screening of ionic liquids for separation of ethyl acetate-acetonitrile azeotrope based on COSMO-RS [J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(1): 146-153.
[2] PAN Peiyuan, CHEN Heng, JIAO Jian, LIANG Zhiyuan, ZHAO Qinxinq. In-plant experimental study on desulfurized flue gas corrosion [J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(1): 161-169.
[3] DING Jiong, CHEN Qi, XU Qiyue, YANG Suijun, YE Shuliang. ARC thermal inertia correction method based on C80 data merging [J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(1): 417-424.
[4] DENG Weifeng, JIANG Zhenhua, LIU Shaoshuai, ZHANG Ankuo, WU Yinong. Optimization design and experimental properties of high-temperature and high-capacity pulse tube cooler [J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(1): 107-115.
[5] XIONG Pan, YAN Shuguang, LIU Weiyin. Structure optimization of cyclone based on response surface method [J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(1): 154-160.
[6] LI Jingyan, LIU Zhongliang, ZHOU Yu, LI Yanxia. Study of thermal-hydrologic-mechanical numerical simulation model on CO2 plume geothermal system [J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(1): 72-82.
[7] SUN Xing, XU Keke, MENG Hua. Supercritical-pressure heat transfer of n-decane with fuel pyrolysis in helical tube [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(S1): 20-25.
[8] BO Lin, SUN Baozhi, GAN Yiran, DING Hongda, SHI Jianxin. Simulation of heat transfer performance of once-through steam generator under primary side disturbance [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(S1): 64-71.
[9] ZHANG Jizong, CHANG Houchun, CHANG Jianmin, LONG Jinxing, LI Xuehui. Effect of bio-oil on properties of bio-oil starch adhesive [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(S1): 123-128.
[10] HU Peiyu, WANG Shugang, SONG Shuanglin, JIANG Shuang, LIANG Yuntao. Medial axis extraction method of pore structure based on fully parallel thinning algorithm [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(S1): 26-33.
[11] ZHENG Lifang, WANG Zhaozhong, XIE Yajie, YUE Lina, WANG Li. Kinetic study on thermal decomposition of GFRP under γ irradiation [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(S1): 161-169.
[12] ZHONG Yingjie, HUANG Qi, DENG Kai, ZHAO Chuangyao, SU Yihua. Analysis of flow characteristics in triangular grooved channel by pulsating flow at low Reynolds number [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(9): 3806-3813.
[13] LI Yajuan, ZHAO Chuanqi, YANG Yuesuo, WANG Yuanyuan, SONG Xiaoming. Mechanism and model of dynamic adsorption of glyphosate contaminated water on graphene-based iron oxide composite [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(9): 3944-3953.
[14] NIU Peifeng, WANG Xiaofei, LIU Nan, WANG Yuanning, CHANG Lingfang, ZHANG Xianchen. Modeling method of ASOS-ELM and its application in prediction of heat rate of steam turbine [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(9): 3924-3931.
[15] LIU Fangqi, YU Dunxi, WU Jianqun, LEI Yu, WEN Chang, XU Minghou. Effect of SCR on particulate matter emissions from a coal-fired boiler [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(9): 4051-4057.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!