CIESC Journal ›› 2014, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (4): 1303-1309.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.04.021

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Tradeoff between whole margin and control performance for chemical process

XU Feng, JIANG Huirong, WANG Rui, LUO Xionglin   

  1. Research Institute of Automation, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
  • Received:2013-07-18 Revised:2013-09-22 Online:2014-04-05 Published:2013-11-27
  • Supported by:

    supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21006127), the National Basic Research Program of China (2012CB720500) and the Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing (KYJJ2012-05-28).

Abstract: The whole margin of a chemical process can be evaluated by the economic benefits of operation optimization, and based on steady-state optimization and dynamic optimization it can be further divided into control margin for dynamic operation and process margin for achievable economic benefits, both of which are relevant to control performance of the chemical process. In this paper, multi-objective dynamic optimization was implemented for a chemical process with design margin, whose optimization objectives were the achievable economic benefits of operating point and the control performance of dynamic process. The control structure described by 0-1 variables and control parameters were the optimization variables to form a mixed-integer dynamic optimization. Constrained NSGA-Ⅱ was used to solve the multi-objective dynamic optimization problem. Based on the Pareto optimal solution set, the relationship between control margin, process margin and control performance was analyzed. The case study of FCCU showed that, for a chemical process with design margin, when control performance was improved, the process would need more control margin but less process margin, which meant less achievable economic benefits from operation optimization. Through the trade-off between control margin and process margin, an optimum operating point and control scheme could be found to fulfill both process and control demand.

Key words: whole margin, control performance, operation optimization, multi-objective optimizationn

CLC Number: 

  • TQ021.8
[1] Bansal V, Perkins J D, Pistikopoulos E N. A case study in simultaneous design and control using rigorous, mixed-integer dynamic optimization models[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2002, 41(4): 760-778
[2] Ulasa S, Diwekar U M. Integrating product and process design with optimal control: a case study of solvent recycling[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2006, 61(6): 2001-2009
[3] Miranda M, Reneaume J M, Meyer X, Meyer M, Szigeti F. Integrating process design and control: an application of optimal control to chemical processes[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2008, 47(11): 2004-2018
[4] Sakizlis V, Perkins J D, Pistikopoulos E N. Parametric controllers in simultaneous process and control design optimization[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2003, 42(20): 4545-4563
[5] Sanchez-Sanchez K B, Ricardez-Sandoval L A. Simultaneous design and control under uncertainty using model predictive control[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(13): 4815- 4833
[6] Chawankul N, Budman1 H, Douglas P L. The integration of design and control: IMC control and robustness[J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2005, 29(2): 261-271
[7] Bansal V, Sakizlis V, Ross R, Perkins J D, Pistikopoulos E N. New algorithms for mixed integer dynamic optimization[J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2003, 27(5): 647-668
[8] Lu X J, Li H, Yuan X. PSO-based intelligent integration of design and control for one kind of curing process[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2010, 20(10): 1116-1125
[9] Asteasuain M, Brandolin A, Sarmoria C, Bandoni A. Simultaneous design and control of a semibatch styrene polymerization reactor[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2004, 43(17): 5233- 5247
[10] Asteasuain M, Sarmoria C, Brandolin A, Bandoni A. Integration of control aspects and uncertainty in the process design of polymerization reactors[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2007, 131(1/2/3): 135-144
[11] Flores-Tlacuahuac A, Biegler L T. Integrated control and process design during optimal polymer grade transition operations[J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2008, 32(11): 2823-2837
[12] Grosch R, Monnigmann M, Marquardt W. Integrated design and control for robust performance: application to an MSMPR crystallizer[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2008, 18(2): 173-188
[13] Ricardez-Sandoval L A, Douglas P L, Budman H M. A methodology for the simultaneous design and control of large-scale systems under process parameter uncertainty[J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2011, 35(2): 307-318
[14] Ricardez-Sandoval L A. Optimal design and control of dynamic systems under uncertainty: a probabilistic approach[J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2012, 43(10): 91-107
[15] Sánchez-Sánchez K, Ricardez-Sandoval L A. Simultaneous process synthesis and control design under uncertainty: a worst-case performance approach[J]. AIChE J., 2013, 59(7): 2497-2514
[16] Muñoz D A, Gerhard J, Marquardt W. A normal vector approach for integrated process and control design with uncertain model parameters and disturbances[J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2012, 40(11): 202-212
[17] Sharifzadeh M, Thornhill N F. Integrated design and control using a dynamic inversely controlled process model[J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2013, 48(10): 121-134
[18] Kuhlmann A, Bogle I. Controllability evaluation for nonminimum phase-processes with multiplicity[J]. AIChE J., 2001, 47(11): 2627- 2631
[19] Figueroa J L, Bahri P A, Bandoni J A, Romagnoli J A. Economic impact of disturbance and uncertain parameters in chemical processes—a dynamic back-off analysis[J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 1996, 20(4): 453-461
[20] Soliman M, Swartz C, Baker R. A mixed-integer formulation for back-off under constrained predictive control[J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2008, 32(10): 2409-2419
[21] Li Zhihong(李志红), Hua Ben(华贲). Flexible synthesis of heat exchanger networks for multi-period operation[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities(高校化学工程学报), 1999, 13(3): 252-258
[22] Xu Qiang(徐强), Chen Bingzhen(陈丙珍), He Xiaorong(何小荣). Flexible synthesis in chemical processing systems[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(清华大学学报), 2001, 41(6): 44-47
[23] Karafyllis I, Kokossis A. On a new measure for the integration of process design and control: the disturbance resiliency index[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2002, 57(5): 873-886
[24] Xu Feng(许锋), Luo Xionglin(罗雄麟). Manipulation margin and control performance analysis of chemical process under advanced process control[J]. CIESC Journal(化工学报), 2012, 63(3): 881-886
[25] Xu Feng(许锋), Luo Xionglin(罗雄麟). Margin analysis and control design of FCCU regenerator based on dynamic optimization (Ⅰ): Mathematical description of dynamic optimization[J]. CIESC Journal(化工学报), 2009, 60(3): 675-682
[26] Xu Feng(许锋), Luo Xionglin(罗雄麟). Margin analysis and control design of FCCU regenerator based on dynamic optimization (Ⅱ): Solution and result analysis[J]. CIESC Journal(化工学报), 2009, 60(3): 683-690
[27] Xu Feng(许锋), Jiang Huirong(蒋慧蓉), Wang Rui(王锐), Luo Xionglin(罗雄麟). Margin evaluation and bottleneck analysis for FCCU[J]. CIESC Journal(化工学报), 2013, 64(6): 2131-2144
[28] Deb K, Pratap A, Agrawal S, Meyarivan T. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182-197
[1] LUO Lin, YANG Bo, LI Hongguang. A dynamic multi-attribute decision making approach to industrial process control performance evaluations [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(S1): 87-94.
[2] XIE Fuming, XU Feng, LIANG Zhishan, LUO Xionglin, SHI Fengyong. Full-cycle operation optimization of acetylene hydrogenation reactor [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(3): 1081-1091.
[3] HU Yimin, LI Guoqing, ZHANG Jialong. Revamping of parameter input of MFAC and utilization in gas fractionation unit [J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(10): 4076-4084.
[4] LUO Xionglin, ZHAO Han, XU Feng. Two-time scale modeling and dynamic characteristics analysis of flash tank in TE process [J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(1): 186-196.
[5] XU Feng, JIANG Huirong, WANG Rui, LUO Xionglin. Margin evaluation and bottleneck analysis for FCCU [J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(6): 2131-2144.
[6] LIN Zixin1,YIN Qiying2,ZHENG Xuesong2,SMITH Robin3. Operation optimization of utility systems based on reliability analysis [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree, 2013, 32(03): 707-711.
[7] LIN Zixiong1,YAN Liexiang1,LI Xiaochun2,SHI Bin1,LU Hai1. Distillation process operation optimization based on process simulator and the line-up competition algorithm [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree, 2013, 32(01): 54-58.
[8] YAN Feng, GUI Weihua, CHEN Yong, XIE Yongfang, REN Huifeng. Optimization method for adding cold charges operation in process of copper converter [J]. CIESC Journal, 2012, 63(9): 2777-2782.
[9] SUN Yang, GU Xingsheng. Coal water slurry gasification unit operation optimization technology and its application [J]. CIESC Journal, 2012, 63(9): 2799-2804.
[10] ZHAO Chao, ZHANG Dengfeng, XU Qiaoling, LI Xuelai. Control performance assessment of model predictive control based on statistics analysis of weighted points [J]. CIESC Journal, 2012, 63(12): 3971-3977.
[11] WEI Minghui, LUO Xionglin, FENG Aixiang. Predictive controller for nonlinear unsymmetrical systems based on control performance comparison [J]. CIESC Journal, 2012, 63(10): 3183-3188.
[12] ZHAO Yu, SU Hongye, CHU Jian, GU Yong. Multivariable Control Performance Assessment Based on Generalized Minimum Variance Benchmark [J]. , 2010, 18(1): 86-94.
[13] NI Jin,CUI Guomin,JIANG Hui,HU Xiangbai. Flexibility identification and operation optimization based on by-pass adjustment of heat exchanger networks [J]. , 2010, 29(1): 17-.
[14] LIYong, CAOGuangyi, YUQingchun. Daily Operation Optimization of a Residential Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Power System Using Genetic Algorithm [J]. , 2006, 14(3): 349-356.
Full text



No Suggested Reading articles found!