基于控制室爆炸载荷的可燃气云等价尺寸阈值

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170458

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (12): 4857-4864.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170458

基于控制室爆炸载荷的可燃气云等价尺寸阈值

齐心歌¹, 王海清¹, 宋贤生², 陈国明¹

1 中国石油大学(华东)安全科学与工程系, 山东青岛 266580;
2 劳氏瑞安咨询有限公司, 上海 200001

收稿日期:2017-04-24 修回日期:2017-08-28 出版日期:2017-12-05 发布日期:2017-12-05
通讯作者: 王海清
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项子课题项目（D719-ZGSY-555）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（17CX06004）。

Threshold of equivalent gas cloud size based on explosion load of control room

QI Xinge¹, WANG Haiqing¹, SONG Xiansheng², CHEN Guoming¹

1 Department of Safety Science and Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
2 Lloyd's Register Consulting-Energy Incorporated, Shanghai 200001, China

Received:2017-04-24 Revised:2017-08-28 Online:2017-12-05 Published:2017-12-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (D719-ZGSY-555) and the Central Universities Fundamental Research Funds Project (17CX06004).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

火气系统是防控气体泄漏灾害的重要安全屏障。可燃气体泄漏后与空气混合形成可燃气云，其爆炸属于体积爆炸，具有复杂性和多变性，因此将其折算为等价气云并提出阈值尺寸计算方法，是实现火气系统探测器网络量化布设的关键输入指标。选取控制室为受体，以载荷作为爆炸冲击波超压的临界值，运用多能法倒序计算，逆推得到对应的等价气云尺寸作为探测阈值，进而利用等价气云方法与高斯扩散模型得到火气系统探测临界时间。通过某LNG罐区案例分析，定量确定了该罐区可承载的气云尺寸最大值及扩散临界时间。数值计算表明，等价气云尺寸阈值不仅可以作为火气系统探测设计的量化输入指标依据，并可对探测时间设置以及气体泄漏及爆炸的防控措施提供理论支持。

关键词: 气云, 爆炸, 火气系统, 爆炸载荷, 等价气云尺寸, 阈值, 安全, 模拟

Abstract:

Fire alarm and gas detector system (FGS) is the important safety barrier to prevent gas leakage. Combustible gas leaks and forms combustible gas cloud mixing with air, and its explosion belongs to volume explosion. The gas cloud has complexity and variability subject to a variety of factors, so it is converted into equivalent gas cloud and the threshold size calculation method is proposed. The threshold is key input index to realize the quantitative layout of detector network of FGS. The control room is selected as a receptor for analysis. Based on the critical value of shock wave overpressure which takes load of control room, the corresponding equivalent gas cloud size is calculated as the detecting threshold of combustible gas cloud by using multi-energy method in reverse order. Then the critical detecting time of the FGS is calculated by using equivalent air cloud computing method and Gaussian diffusion model. Through one LNG tank industry case analysis, the maximum cloud size which can be carried by the industry and the critical time of diffusion can be quantitatively determined. The numerical calculation shows that the equivalent gas cloud size threshold can not only be used as the quantitative input indicators for detector design of FGS, but also provide theoretical support for the detection time setting and the prevention and control measures of gas leakage and explosion.

Key words: gas cloud, explosion, fire alarm and gas detector system, explosive load, equivalent gas cloud size, threshold size, safety, simulation

中图分类号:

X937

齐心歌, 王海清, 宋贤生, 陈国明. 基于控制室爆炸载荷的可燃气云等价尺寸阈值[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4857-4864.

QI Xinge, WANG Haiqing, SONG Xiansheng, CHEN Guoming. Threshold of equivalent gas cloud size based on explosion load of control room[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(12): 4857-4864.

参考文献 31

[1]	DÍAZ A F, GONZÁLEZ F E, SÁNCHEZ PÉREZ J F, et al. Characteristic overpressure-impulse-distance curves for vapour cloud explosions using the TNO multi-energy model[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2006, 137(2):734-741.
[2]	何思念, 常华伟, 文科, 等. 液化天然气泄漏和水面扩散过程模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(S2):213-219. HE S N, CHANG H W, WEN K, et al. Mathematical modeling of LNG spills and pool spreading on water[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(S2):213-219.
[3]	李兆慈, 张文花, 郑梅, 等. LNG连续泄漏扩散过程模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(S2):158-165. LI Z C, ZHANG W H, ZHENG M, et al. LNG continuous leakage and diffusion process simulation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(S2):158-165.
[4]	ANGAL R, DEWAN A, SUBRAMANIAN K A. Computational study of turbulent hydrogen dispersion hazards in a closed space[J]. IUP Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 5(2):28-42.
[5]	MIDDHA P, ICHARD M, ARNTZEN B J. Validation of CFD modelling of LH2, spread and evaporation against large-scale spill experiments[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(3):2620-2627.
[6]	BJERKETVEDT D, BAKKE J R, WINGERDEN K V. Gas explosion handbook[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1997, 52(1):1-150.
[7]	HANSEN O R, GAVELLI F, DAVIS S G, et al. Equivalent cloud methods used for explosion risk and consequence studies[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26(3):511-527.
[8]	ZHANG Y Q, OLDENBURG C M, PAN L H. Fast estimation of dense gas dispersion from multiple continuous CO2, surface leakage sources for risk assessment[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2016, 49:323-329.
[9]	International Electrotechnical Commission. Functional Safety-Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industry Sector:IEC 61511-2003[S]. International Electrotechnical Commission, 2003.
[10]	中华人民共和国建设部. 石油化工可燃气体和有毒气体检测报警设计规范:GB 50493-2009[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2009. Ministry of Construction of the People's Republic of China. Code for design of combustible gas and toxic gas detection and alarm for petrochemical industry:GB 50493-2009[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press, 2009.
[11]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 火灾自动报警系统设计规范:GB 50116-2013[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2013. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Code for design of automatic fire alarm system:GB 50116-2013[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press, 2013.
[12]	王海清, 王玉秀, 宋贤生, 等. 采用遗传算法优化气体探测器布局策略研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12(9):86-91. WANG H Q, WANG Y X, SONG X S, et al. Study on layout optimization strategy of gas detectors using genetic algorithm[J]. China Safety Science and Technology, 2016, 12(9):86-91.
[13]	Technical Report Guidance on the evaluation of fire, combustible gas and toxic system effectiveness:ISA TR84.00.07-2010[S].
[14]	DEFRIEND S, DEJMEK M, PORTER L, et al. A risk-based approach to flammable gas detector spacing[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 159(1):142-151.
[15]	SEO J K, DU C K, HA Y C, et al. A methodology for determining efficient gas detector locations on offshore installations[J]. Ships & Offshore Structures, 2013, 8(5):524-535.
[16]	GIMENES G B C, SANTOS P C D, SOUZA V C D, et al. Development of a methodology for toxic and flammable gases sensors positioning in oil platforms[C]//AIChE Spring National Meeting, 2008.
[17]	章博, 王磊, 王志刚. 炼油装置有害气体泄漏区域风险等级划分[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(5):144-149. ZHANG B, WANG L, WNAG Z G. Area risk level classification for hazardous gas release in petroleum refining installations[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2015, 39(5):144-149.
[18]	尚胜美, 王海清, 刘俊芳. FPSO火灾气体探测器的优化布置研究[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2013, 42(3):311-315. SHANG S M, WANG H Q, LIU J F. Study on optimized layout of fire and gas detectors in FPSO[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil and Gas, 2013, 42(3):311-315.
[19]	LEGG S W, WANG C, BENAVIDES-SERRANO A J, et al. Optimal gas detector placement under uncertainty considering Conditional-Value-at-Risk[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26(3):410-417.
[20]	LEGG S W, BENAVIDES-SERRANO A J, SⅡROLA J D, et al. A stochastic programming approach for gas detector placement using CFD-based dispersion simulations[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2012, 47(12):194-201.
[21]	HANSEN O R, KJELLANDER M T, MARTINI R, et al. Estimation of explosion loading on small and medium sized equipment from CFD simulations[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 41:382-398.
[22]	AHMED I, BENGHERBIA T, ZHVANSKY R, et al. Validation of geometry modelling approaches for offshore gas dispersion simulations[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 44:594-600.
[23]	ASCE Petrochemical Energy Committee. Design of Blast Resistant Buildings in Petrochemical Facilities[S]. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010.
[24]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 石油化工控制室抗爆设计规范:GB 50779-2012[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2012. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Code for design of blast resistant control building in petrochemical industry:GB 50779-2012[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press, 2012.
[25]	宇德明. 易燃、易爆、有毒危险品储运过程定量风险评价[M]. 北京:中国铁道出版社, 2000. YU D M. Quantitative Risk Assessment of Flammable, Explosive and Dangerous Goods Storage and Transportation Process[M]. Beijing:China Railway Press, 2000.
[26]	BOSCH C J H, WETERINGS R A P M. Methods for the Calculation of Physical Effects (Yellow Book)[M]. The Hague:Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, 2005.
[27]	FALLAH-SHORSHANI M, SHEKARRIZFARD M, HATZOPOULOU M. Integrating a street-canyon model with a regional Gaussian dispersion model for improved characterisation of near-road air pollution[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2017, 153(3):21-31.
[28]	唐建峰, 蔡娜, 郭清, 等. LNG垂直喷射源连续泄漏扩散的模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(3):1124-1131. TANG J F, CAI N, GUO Q, et al. Simulation of LNG diffusion:a continuous vertical jet release[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(3):1124-1131.
[29]	FIATES J, VIANNA S S V. Numerical modelling of gas dispersion using OpenFOAM[J]. Process Safety & Environmental Protection, 2016, 104:277-293.
[30]	国家安全生产监督管理总局. 化工企业定量风险评价导则:AQ/T 3046-2013[S]. 北京:煤炭工业出版社, 2013. State Administration of Work Safety. Guidelines for quantitative risk assessment of chemical enterprises:AQ/T 3046-2013[S]. Beijing:China Coal Industry Publishing House, 2013.
[31]	中华人民共和国工业和信息化部. 控制室设计规范:HG/T 20508-2014[S]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2014. Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China. Control room design specification:HG/T 20508-2014[S]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2014.

基于控制室爆炸载荷的可燃气云等价尺寸阈值

Threshold of equivalent gas cloud size based on explosion load of control room

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	叶展羽, 山訸, 徐震原. 用于太阳能蒸发的折纸式蒸发器性能仿真[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 132-140.
[2]	张龙, 宋孟杰, 邵苛苛, 张旋, 沈俊, 高润淼, 甄泽康, 江正勇. 管翅式换热器迎风侧翅片末端霜层生长模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 179-182.
[3]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[4]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[5]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[6]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[7]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[8]	刘远超, 关斌, 钟建斌, 徐一帆, 蒋旭浩, 李耑. 单层XSe₂（X=Zr/Hf）的热电输运特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3968-3978.
[9]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[10]	宋明昊, 赵霏, 刘淑晴, 李国选, 杨声, 雷志刚. 离子液体脱除模拟油中挥发酚的多尺度模拟与研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3654-3664.
[11]	胡建波, 刘洪超, 胡齐, 黄美英, 宋先雨, 赵双良. 有机笼跨细胞膜易位行为的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3756-3765.
[12]	赵佳佳, 田世祥, 李鹏, 谢洪高. SiO₂-H₂O纳米流体强化煤尘润湿性的微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3931-3945.
[13]	杨克, 贾岳, 纪虹, 邢志祥, 蒋军成. 垃圾焚烧飞灰对瓦斯爆炸压力及火焰传播的抑制作用及机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3597-3607.
[14]	韩晨, 司徒友珉, 朱斌, 许建良, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 协同处理废液的多喷嘴粉煤气化炉内反应流动研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3266-3278.
[15]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.