混合多目标骨干粒子群优化算法在污水处理过程优化控制中的应用

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170583

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (9): 3511-3521.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170583

混合多目标骨干粒子群优化算法在污水处理过程优化控制中的应用

周红标^1,2,3, 乔俊飞^1,2

1 北京工业大学信息学部, 北京 100124;
2 计算智能和智能系统北京市重点实验室, 北京 100124;
3 淮阴工学院自动化学院, 江苏淮安 223003

收稿日期:2017-05-09 修回日期:2017-06-05 出版日期:2017-09-05 发布日期:2017-09-05
通讯作者: 乔俊飞
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目（61533002）。

Optimal control of wastewater treatment process using hybrid multi-objective barebones particle swarm optimization algorithm

ZHOU Hongbiao^1,2,3, QIAO Junfei^1,2

1 Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;
2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Computational Intelligence and Intelligent System, Beijing 100124, China;
3 Faculty of Automation, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai'an 223003, Jiangsu, China

Received:2017-05-09 Revised:2017-06-05 Online:2017-09-05 Published:2017-09-05
Contact: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170583
Supported by:
supported by the State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (61533002).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过对污水生化处理过程的分析，选取能耗和罚款最低为优化目标，建立污水生化处理过程多目标优化控制模型。为了提高Pareto最优解集的收敛性和多样性，提出一种基于Pareto支配和分解的混合多目标骨干粒子群优化算法（HBBMOPSO）。该方法采用带自适应惩罚因子的分解方法选取个体引导者，采用Pareto支配和拥挤距离法维护外部档案和选取全局引导者。此外，采用精英学习策略增强粒子跳出局部Pareto前沿的能力。最后，将HBBMOPSO与自组织模糊神经网络预测模型和自组织控制器相结合，实现污水生化处理过程溶解氧和硝态氮设定值的动态寻优、智能决策和底层跟踪控制。利用国际基准仿真平台BSM1进行实验验证，结果表明所提HBBMOPSO方法在保证出水水质参数达标的前提下，能够有效降低污水处理过程的能耗。

关键词: 污水, 优化, 过程控制, 粒子群, 分解

Abstract:

Through analysis of biological wastewater treatment process (WWTP), a multi-objective optimal control strategy was developed with targets of minimizing both energy consumption and amercement. A hybrid multi-objective barebones particle swarm optimization (HBBMOPSO) algorithm based on Pareto dominance and decomposition was proposed to improve convergence and diversity of optimized set of Pareto solutions. In HBBMOPSO, selection of personal leaders was determined from self-adaptive penalty factor decomposition while maintenance of external dossiers and selection of global leaders were determined from dominance and crowded distance. Furthermore, elitism learning strategy was adopted to facilitate particle escaping from local Pareto fronts. Finally, HBBMOPSO was combined with self-organizing fuzzy nerve network modeler and controller to realize dynamic optimization, intelligent decision, and background monitoring on dissolved oxygen and nitrate nitrogen in biological WWTP. Experimental study on international standardized simulator platform BSM1 showed that HBBMOPSO method can effectively reduce energy consumption under the premise of ensuring effluent to meet quality standard.

Key words: wastewater, optimization, process control, particle swarm, decomposition

中图分类号:

TP273

周红标, 乔俊飞. 混合多目标骨干粒子群优化算法在污水处理过程优化控制中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(9): 3511-3521.

ZHOU Hongbiao, QIAO Junfei. Optimal control of wastewater treatment process using hybrid multi-objective barebones particle swarm optimization algorithm[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(9): 3511-3521.

参考文献 35

[1]	WAN J F, GU J, ZHAO Q, et al. COD capture:a feasible option towards energy self-sufficient domestic wastewater treatment[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(4):1-9.
[2]	OTURAN M A, AARON J J. Advanced oxidation processes in water/wastewater treatment:principles and applications. A review[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2014, 44(23):2577-2641.
[3]	SANTÍN I, PEDRET C, VILANOVA R, et al. Removing violations of the effluent pollution in a wastewater treatment process[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 279(11):207-219.
[4]	JUDD S J. The status of industrial and municipal effluent treatment with membrane bioreactor technology[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 305(12):37-45.
[5]	ÅMAND L, CARLSSON B. Optimal aeration control in a nitrifying activated sludge process[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(7):2101-2110.
[6]	HREIZ R, LATIFI M A, ROCHE N. Optimal design and operation of activated sludge processes:state-of-the-art[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 281(12):900-920.
[7]	OSTACE G S, BAEZA J A, GUERRERO J, et al. Development and economic assessment of different WWTP control strategies for optimal simultaneous removal of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus[J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2013, 53(6):164-177.
[8]	SANTIN I, PEDRET C, VILANOVA R. Applying variable dissolved oxygen set point in a two level hierarchical control structure to a wastewater treatment process[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2015, 28(4):40-55.
[9]	韩广, 乔俊飞, 韩红桂, 等. 基于Hopfield神经网络的污水处理过程优化控制[J]. 控制与决策, 2014, 29(11):2085-2088. HAN G, QIAO J F, HAN H G, et al. Optimal control for wastewater treatment process based on Hopfield neural network[J]. Control and Decision, 2014, 29(11):2085-2088.
[10]	MACHADO V C, GABRIEL D, LAFUENTE J, et al. Cost and effluent quality controllers design based on the relative gain array for a nutrient removal WWTP[J]. Water Research, 2009, 43(20):5129-5141.
[11]	QIAO J F, BO Y C, CHAI W, et al. Adaptive optimal control for a wastewater treatment plant based on a data-driven method[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2013, 67(10):2314-2320.
[12]	DAI H L, CHEN W L, LU X W. The application of multi-objective optimization method for activated sludge process:a review[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2016, 73(2):223-235.
[13]	HAKANEN J, SAHLSTEDT K, MIETTINEN K. Wastewater treatment plant design and operation under multiple conflicting objective functions[J]. Environmental Modelling and Software, 2013, 46(4):240-249.
[14]	SWEETAPPLE C, FU G T, BUTLER D. Multi-objective optimisation of wastewater treatment plant control to reduce greenhouse gas emissions[J]. Water Research, 2014, 55(2):52-62.
[15]	HREIZ R, ROCHE N, BENYAHIA B, et al. Multi-objective optimal control of small-size wastewater treatment plants[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2015, 102(7):345-353.
[16]	CHEN W L, LU X W, YAO C H. Optimal strategies evaluated by multi-objective optimization method for improving the performance of a novel cycle operating activated sludge process[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 260(9):492-502.
[17]	ZHANG R, XIE W M, YU H Q, et al. Optimizing municipal wastewater treatment plants using an improved multi-objective optimization method[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 157(2):161-165.
[18]	QIAO J F, ZHANG W. Dynamic multi-objective optimization control for wastewater treatment process[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2016, 28(10):1-11.
[19]	KENNEDY J, EBERHART R C. Particle swarm optimization[C]//Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. 1995:1942-1948.
[20]	COELLO C A C, PULIDO G T, LECHUGA M S. Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2004, 8(3):256-279.
[21]	HU W, YEN G G. Adaptive multiobjective particle swarm optimization based on parallel cell coordinate system[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2015, 19(1):1-18.
[22]	TRIPATHI P K, BANDYOPADHYAY S, PAL S K. Multi-objective particle swarm optimization with time variant inertia and acceleration coefficients[J]. Information Sciences, 2007, 177(22):5033-5049.
[23]	KENNEDY J. Bare bones particle swarms[C]//Proceedings of IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium. 2003:80-87.
[24]	ZHANG Y, GONG D W, DING Z H. A bare-bones multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm for environmental/economic dispatch[J]. Information Sciences, 2012, 192(6):213-227.
[25]	ZHANG Y, GONG D W, GENG N, et al. Hybrid bare-bones PSO for dynamic economic dispatch with valve-point effects[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2014, 18(5):248-260.
[26]	DEB K, PRATAP A, AGARWAL S, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm:NSGA-Ⅱ[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2):182-197.
[27]	ZHANG Q F, LI H. MOEA/D:a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2007, 11(6):712-731.
[28]	ZAPOTECAS MARTÍNEZ S, COELLO COELLO C A. A multi-objective particle swarm optimizer based on decomposition[C]//Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. 2011:69-76.
[29]	乔俊飞, 周红标. 基于自组织模糊神经网络的出水总磷预测[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2017, 34(2):224-232. QIAO J F, ZHOU H B. Prediction of effluent total phosphorus based on self-organizing fuzzy neural network[J]. Control Theory and Applications, 2017, 34(2):224-232.
[30]	周红标. 基于自组织模糊神经网络的污水处理过程溶解氧控制[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(4):1516-1524. ZHOU H B. Dissolved oxygen control of the wastewater treatment process using self-organizing fuzzy neural network[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(4):1516-1524.
[31]	JEPPSSON U, PONS M N. The COST benchmark simulation model-current state and future perspective[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2004, 12(3):299-304.
[32]	HAN H G, QIAN H H, QIAO J F. Nonlinear multiobjective model-predictive control scheme for wastewater treatment process[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2014, 24(3):47-59.
[33]	YANG S X, JIANG S Y, JIANG Y. Improving the multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition with new penalty schemes[J]. Soft Computing, 2016, 21(2):1-15.
[34]	LIN Q Z, LI J Q, DU Z H, et al. A novel multi-objective particle swarm optimization with multiple search strategies[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 247(3):732-744.
[35]	LIN Q Z, CHEN J Y, ZHAN Z H, et al. A hybrid evolutionary immune algorithm for multiobjective optimization problems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2016, 20(5):711-729.

混合多目标骨干粒子群优化算法在污水处理过程优化控制中的应用

Optimal control of wastewater treatment process using hybrid multi-objective barebones particle swarm optimization algorithm

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 35

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨欣, 王文, 徐凯, 马凡华. 高压氢气加注过程中温度特征仿真分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 280-286.
[2]	康飞, 吕伟光, 巨锋, 孙峙. 废锂离子电池放电路径与评价研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3903-3911.
[3]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[4]	曹跃, 余冲, 李智, 杨明磊. 工业数据驱动的加氢裂化装置多工况切换过渡状态检测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3841-3854.
[5]	齐聪, 丁子, 余杰, 汤茂清, 梁林. 基于选择吸收纳米薄膜的太阳能温差发电特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3921-3930.
[6]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[7]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[8]	陈国泽, 卫东, 郭倩, 向志平. 负载跟踪状态下的铝空气电池堆最优功率点优化方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3533-3542.
[9]	刘文竹, 云和明, 王宝雪, 胡明哲, 仲崇龙. 基于场协同和耗散的微通道拓扑优化研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3329-3341.
[10]	张曼铮, 肖猛, 闫沛伟, 苗政, 徐进良, 纪献兵. 危废焚烧处理耦合有机朗肯循环系统工质筛选与热力学优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3502-3512.
[11]	诸程瑛, 王振雷. 基于改进深度强化学习的乙烯裂解炉操作优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3429-3437.
[12]	黄可欣, 李彤, 李桉琦, 林梅. 加装旋转叶轮T型通道流场的模态分解[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2848-2857.
[13]	吴文涛, 褚良永, 张玲洁, 谭伟民, 沈丽明, 暴宁钟. 腰果酚生物基自愈合微胶囊的高效制备工艺研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3103-3115.
[14]	汤晓玲, 王嘉瑞, 朱玄烨, 郑仁朝. 基于Pickering乳液的卤醇脱卤酶催化合成手性环氧氯丙烷[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2926-2934.
[15]	文兆伦, 李沛睿, 张忠林, 杜晓, 侯起旺, 刘叶刚, 郝晓刚, 官国清. 基于自热再生的隔壁塔深冷空分工艺设计及优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2988-2998.