工业规模CO2管道大孔泄漏过程中的射流膨胀及扩散规律

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161614

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (6): 2298-2305.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161614

工业规模CO₂管道大孔泄漏过程中的射流膨胀及扩散规律

喻健良, 郑阳光, 闫兴清, 郭晓璐, 曹琦, 朱海龙, 刘少荣

大连理工大学化工机械与安全学院, 辽宁大连 116024

收稿日期:2016-11-15 修回日期:2017-02-21 出版日期:2017-06-05 发布日期:2017-06-05
通讯作者: 喻健良
基金资助:
欧盟第七框架（FP7-ENERGY-2009-1，协议号241346；FP7-ENERGY-2012-1-2STAGE，协议号309102）

Under-expanded jets and dispersion during big hole leakage of high pressure CO₂ pipeline in industrial scale

YU Jianliang, ZHENG Yangguang, YAN Xingqing, GUO Xiaolu, CAO Qi, ZHU Hailong, LIU Shaorong

School of Chemical Machinery and Safety, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, China

Received:2016-11-15 Revised:2017-02-21 Online:2017-06-05 Published:2017-06-05
Contact: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161614
Supported by:
supported by the European Union 7th Framework Programme (FP7-ENERGY-2009-1 under grant agreement number 241346, FP7-ENERGY-2012-1-2STAGE under grant agreement number 309102)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过气相和超临界状态的两组工业规模CO₂管道（长258 m、内径233 mm、泄放孔径100 mm）泄放实验，分析了近场动压、可见云以及扩散区域温度和浓度变化。研究表明：在大口径气相和超临界CO₂泄放中，泄漏口处会形成高度欠膨胀射流，在射流结构中会生成大量干冰颗粒；后者形成的欠膨胀射流结构范围较大，但马赫盘的位置都在0.4 m内。可见云在快速膨胀后，在一定时间内维持在亚稳定状态，随后缓慢衰减。可见云携带干冰颗粒和水雾快速扩散，干冰颗粒在降至地面前已全部升华，未形成干冰床。气相与超临界泄放中的扩散区域温度在迅速下降后缓慢上升，且超临界泄放中温降更大；CO₂浓度均升高后缓慢下降，预测二者5%浓度在泄漏方向上的危险距离至少为30和50 m。

关键词: 二氧化碳, 管道泄放, 扩散, 相变, 欠膨胀射流

Abstract:

Based on two groups of gaseous and supercritical CO₂ release experiments using an industrial scale CO₂ pipeline (258 m long, 233 mm i.d.) through a 100 mm diameter orifice, the dynamic pressure and visible cloud in the near field, and the temperature and concentration changes in the diffusion region were analyzed. The results show that the sharp drop in inventory pressure near the orifice produced a highly under-expanded jet and induced a sharp drop in temperature as a result of Joule-Thomson cooling. This effect led to the formation of solid CO₂ particles inside the under-expanded jet. The visible cloud remained a metastable state after the rapid expansion, and followed by a slow attenuation stage. The visible white cloud entraining the dry ice particles and condensed water rapidly expanded in the rapid expansion stage and dry ice particles have been sublimated into the ground before and did not form the ice bed. At the moment of the rupture, the temperature in the discharge area of gaseous and supercritical CO₂ releases dropped rapidly and then increased slowly, while the CO₂ concentrations increased quickly and then decreased. The dangerous distance of the 5% concentration of gaseous and supercritical CO₂ releases were at least 30 m and 50 m respectively.

Key words: carbon dioxide, pipeline release, diffusion, phase change, under-expanded jets

中图分类号:

X937

喻健良, 郑阳光, 闫兴清, 郭晓璐, 曹琦, 朱海龙, 刘少荣. 工业规模CO₂管道大孔泄漏过程中的射流膨胀及扩散规律[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(6): 2298-2305.

YU Jianliang, ZHENG Yangguang, YAN Xingqing, GUO Xiaolu, CAO Qi, ZHU Hailong, LIU Shaorong. Under-expanded jets and dispersion during big hole leakage of high pressure CO₂ pipeline in industrial scale[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(6): 2298-2305.

参考文献 30

[1]	AGENCY I E. Energy Technology Perspectives 2012: Pathways to a Clean Energy System[M]. International Energy Agency, 2012.
[2]	RIAN K E, GRIMSMO B, LAKSA B, et al. Advanced CO2 dispersion simulation technology for improved CCS safety[J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63: 2596-2609.
[3]	WEE J H. A review on carbon dioxide capture and storage technology using coal fly ash[J]. Appl. Energ., 2013, 106(11): 143-151.
[4]	KOORNNEEF J, SPRUIJT M, MOLAG M, et al. Quantitative risk assessment of CO2 transport by pipelines—a review of uncertainties and their impacts[J]. J. Hazard. Mater., 2010, 177(1/2/3): 12-27.
[5]	MOLAG M, DAM C. Modelling of accidental from a high pressure CO2 pipelines[J]. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4: 2301-2307.
[6]	GANT S E, NARASIMHAMURTHY V D, SKJOLD T, et al. Evaluation of multi-phase atmospheric dispersion models for application to carbon capture and storage[J]. J. Loss Prevent. Proc., 2014, 32: 286-298.
[7]	UDDIN M, JAFARI A, PERKINS E. Effects of mechanical dispersion on CO2 storage in Weyburn CO2-EOR field—numerical history match and prediction[J]. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 2013, 16(8): S35-S49.
[8]	WITLOX H W M, HARPER M, OKE A. Modelling of discharge and atmospheric dispersion for carbon dioxide releases[J]. J. Loss Prevent. Proc., 2009, 22(6): 795-802.
[9]	LUND H, FLATTEN T, MUNKEJORD S T. Depressurization of carbon dioxide in pipelines models and methods[J]. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4(22): 2984-2991.
[10]	MAZZOLDI A, HILL T, COLLS J J. Assessing the risk for CO2 transportation within CCS projects, CFD modelling[J]. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 2011, 5(4): 816-825.
[11]	MAZZOLDI A, PICARD D, SRIRAM P G, et al. Simulation-based estimates of safety distances for pipeline transportation of carbon dioxide[J]. Greenhouse Gases Science & Technology, 2013, 3(1): 66-83.
[12]	MAZZOLDI A, HILL T, COLLS J J. CO2 transportation for carbon capture and storage: sublimation of carbon dioxide from a dry ice bank[J]. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 2008, 2(2): 210-218.
[13]	HERZOG N, EGBERS C. Atmospheric dispersion of CO2, released from pipeline leakages[J]. Energy Procedia, 2013, 40: 232-239.
[14]	WOOLLEY R M, FAIRWEATHER M, WAREING C J, et al. An integrated, multi-scale modelling approach for the simulation of multiphase dispersion from accidental CO2 pipeline releases in realistic terrain[J]. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 2014, 27(8): 221-238.
[15]	WOOLLEY R M, FAIRWEATHER M, WAREING C J, et al. Experimental measurement and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes modelling of the near-field structure of multi-phase CO2 jet releases[J]. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 2013, 18(7): 139-149.
[16]	WOOLLEY R M, FAIRWEATHER M, WAREING C J, et al. CO2 PipeHaz: quantitative hazard assessment for next generation CO2 pipelines[J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63: 2510-2529.
[17]	刘振翼, 周轶, 黄平, 等. CO2管线泄漏扩散小尺度实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(5): 1651-1659.
	LIU Z Y, ZHOU Y, HUANG P, et al. Scaled field test for CO2 leakage and dispersion from pipelines[J]. CIESC Journal, 2012, 63(5): 1651-1659.
[18]	XING J, LIU Z Y, HUANG P, et al. Experimental and numerical study of the dispersion of carbon dioxide plume[J]. J. Hazard. Mater., 2013, 257(1): 40-48.
[19]	XING J, LIU Z Y, HUANG P, et al. CFD validation of scaling rules for reduced-scale field releases of carbon dioxide[J]. Appl. Energ., 2014, 115(4): 525-530.
[20]	XIE Q Y, TU R, JIANG X, et al. The leakage behavior of supercritical CO2 flow in an experimental pipeline system[J]. Appl. Energ., 2014, 130(5): 574-580.
[21]	李康. 小尺度超临界二氧化碳泄漏过程物理机理研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2016.
	LI K. The physical mechanism of the supercritical CO2 leakage process in small scale laboratory conditions[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2016.
[22]	LI K, ZHOU X, TU R, et al. The flow and heat transfer characteristics of supercritical CO2 leakage from a pipeline[J]. Energy, 2014, 71(21): 665-672.
[23]	LI K, ZHOU X, TU R, et al. An experiment investigation of supercritical CO2 accidental release from a pressurized pipeline[J]. J. Supercrit. Fluid, 2016, 107: 298-306.
[24]	AHMAD M, LOWESMITH B, KOEIJER G D, et al. COSHER joint industry project: large scale pipeline rupture tests to study CO2 release and dispersion[J]. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 2015, 37: 340-353.
[25]	LIU X, GODBOLE A, CHENG L, et al. Source strength and dispersion of CO2 releases from high-pressure pipelines: CFD model using real gas equation of state[J]. Appl. Energ., 2014, 126: 56-58.
[26]	LIU X, GODBOLE A, LU C, et al. Study of the consequences of CO2 released from high-pressure pipelines[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 116: 51-64.
[27]	喻健良, 郭晓璐, 闫兴清, 等. 工业规模CO2管道泄放过程中的压力响应及相态变化[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(11): 4327-4334.
	YU J L, GUO X L, YAN X Q, et al. Pressure response and phase transition in process of CO2 pipeline release in industrial scale[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(11): 4327-4334.
[28]	GUO X L, YAN X Q, YU J L, et al. Pressure responses and phase transitions during the release of high pressure CO2 from a large-scale popeline[J]. Energy, 2017, 118: 1066-1078.
[29]	GUO X L, YAN X Q, YU J L, et al. Under-expanded jets and dispersion in supercritical CO2 releases from a large-scale pipeline[J]. Appl. Energ., 2016, 183: 1279-1291.
[30]	GUO X L, YAN X Q, YU J L, et al. Pressure response and phase transition in supercritical CO2 releases from a large-scale pipeline[J]. Appl. Energ., 2016, 178: 189-197.

工业规模CO₂管道大孔泄漏过程中的射流膨胀及扩散规律

Under-expanded jets and dispersion during big hole leakage of high pressure CO₂ pipeline in industrial scale

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋瑞涛, 王派, 王云鹏, 李敏霞, 党超镔, 陈振国, 童欢, 周佳琦. 二氧化碳直接蒸发冰场排管内流动沸腾换热数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 96-103.
[2]	张双星, 刘舫辰, 张义飞, 杜文静. R-134a脉动热管相变蓄放热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 165-171.
[3]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[4]	江河, 袁俊飞, 王林, 邢谷雨. 均流腔结构对微细通道内相变流动特性影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 235-244.
[5]	吴延鹏, 刘乾隆, 田东民, 陈凤君. 相变材料与热管耦合的电子器件热管理研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 25-31.
[6]	程业品, 胡达清, 徐奕莎, 刘华彦, 卢晗锋, 崔国凯. 离子液体基低共熔溶剂在转化CO₂中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3640-3653.
[7]	杨菲菲, 赵世熙, 周维, 倪中海. Sn掺杂的In₂O₃催化CO₂选择性加氢制甲醇[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3366-3374.
[8]	洪瑞, 袁宝强, 杜文静. 垂直上升管内超临界二氧化碳传热恶化机理分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3309-3319.
[9]	张琦钰, 高利军, 苏宇航, 马晓博, 王翊丞, 张亚婷, 胡超. 碳基催化材料在电化学还原二氧化碳中的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2753-2772.
[10]	史昊鹏, 钟达文, 廉学新, 张君峰. 朝下多尺度沟槽翅片结构表面沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2880-2888.
[11]	史方哲, 甘云华. 超薄热管启动特性和传热性能数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2814-2823.
[12]	邢美波, 张中天, 景栋梁, 张洪发. 磁调控水基碳纳米管协同多孔材料强化相变储/释能特性[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3093-3102.
[13]	张贲, 王松柏, 魏子亚, 郝婷婷, 马学虎, 温荣福. 超亲水多孔金属结构驱动的毛细液膜冷凝及传热强化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2824-2835.
[14]	李振, 张博, 王丽伟. PEG-EG固-固相变材料的制备和性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2680-2688.
[15]	毛磊, 刘冠章, 袁航, 张光亚. 可捕集CO₂的纳米碳酸酐酶粒子的高效制备及性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2589-2598.