基于管内相分隔的径向压差在多相流测量的应用

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180493

化工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (12): 5049-5055.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180493

基于管内相分隔的径向压差在多相流测量的应用

王帅^1,2, 王栋², 董宝光¹, 李瑞华¹

1. 中煤能源研究院有限责任公司, 陕西西安 710054;
2. 西安交通大学动力工程多相流国家重点实验室, 陕西西安 710049

收稿日期:2018-05-10 修回日期:2018-09-13 出版日期:2018-12-05 发布日期:2018-12-05
通讯作者: 王帅
基金资助:
国家重大科学仪器设备开发专项项目（51527808）。

Radial differential pressure used in multiphase flow metering based on phase-isolation

WANG Shuai^1,2, WANG Dong², DONG Baoguang¹, LI Ruihua¹

1. China Coal Energy Research Institute Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710049, Shaanxi, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, Shaanxi, China

Received:2018-05-10 Revised:2018-09-13 Online:2018-12-05 Published:2018-12-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Projects of China (51527808).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在管内相分隔技术产生的径向压差应用在单相流测量的基础上，以油水两相流为例，系统地研究了基于管内相分隔产生的径向压差在多相流测量的理论机理，并进行了实验验证。理论分析表明，在管内相分隔状态下，旋流器下游某截面壁面和管中心的径向压差与油水两相流的总质量流量和体积含油率呈一定函数关系，当测量出旋流器下游某截面壁面和管中心的径向压差后，若油水两相流的总质量流量和体积含油率中的任一参数已知，就可以求出另一参数。实验结果显示，在旋流器下游0.075 m和0.115 m的截面上，体积含油率的实验值与理论值的相对误差均在±8.02%以内，此时油水两相流总质量流量的实验值与理论值的相对误差均在±1.44%以内。

关键词: 管内相分隔, 径向压差, 多相流

Abstract:

The phase-isolation technology of multiphase flow in-pipe is widely used in scientific research and engineering area. Based on the application of the phase-isolation technology on single-phase flow measurement, the mechanism of radial differential pressure used in multiphase flow measurement was studied by taking oil-water two-phase flow as an example, and the experimental verification was carried out. The theoretical analysis showed that the radial differential pressure between the pipe wall and pipe center of a cross section downstream of the swirler has a functional relationship between the mass flowrate and oil cut. Once measuring the radial differential pressure between the pipe wall and pipe center of a cross section downstream of the swirler, the mass flowrate and oil cut can be determined if either of the two parameters was known. The experimental results showed that the relative error of oil cut was less than 8.02% for the cross section of 0.075 m or 0.115 m downstream of the swirler, and mass flowrate was less than 1.44%, which provides a theoretical basis for further study of the two-parameter measurement of multiphase flow.

Key words: phase-isolation in-pipe, radial differential pressure, multiphase flow

中图分类号:

O359

王帅, 王栋, 董宝光, 李瑞华. 基于管内相分隔的径向压差在多相流测量的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(12): 5049-5055.

WANG Shuai, WANG Dong, DONG Baoguang, LI Ruihua. Radial differential pressure used in multiphase flow metering based on phase-isolation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(12): 5049-5055.

参考文献 32

[1]	WANG S, WANG D, NIU P M, et al. Mass flowrate measurement using the swirl motion in circular conduits[J]. Flow Measurement & Instrumentation, 2017, 54:177-184.
[2]	WANG S, WANG D, YANG Y, et al. Phase-isolation of upward oil-water flow using centrifugal method[J]. Flow Measurement & Instrumentation, 2015, 46:33-43.
[3]	SHI S Y, XU J Y, SUN H Q, et al. Experimental study of a vane-type pipe separator for oil-water separation[J]. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2012, 90(10):1652-1659.
[4]	SHI S Y, XU J Y. Flow field of continuous phase in a vane-type pipe oil & water separator[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2015, 60:208-212.
[5]	SHI S Y, WU Y X, ZHANG J, et al. A study on separation performance of a vortex finder in a liquid-liquid cylindrical cyclone[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics Ser. B, 2010, 22(5):391-397.
[6]	CAO X W, CHEN L, DU Y J, et al. Numerical simulation of swirling flow characteristics of supersonic swirling natural gas separator[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2007, 31(6):79-80.
[7]	WEN C, CAO X W, YANG Y, et al. Supersonic swirling characteristics of natural gas in convergent-divergent nozzles[J]. Petroleum Science, 2011, 8(1):114-119.
[8]	LIU W, BAI B F. Swirl decay in the gas-liquid two-phase swirling flow inside a circular straight pipe[J]. Experimental Thermal & Fluid Science, 2015, 68:187-195.
[9]	MAGAUD F, NAJAFI A F, ANGILELLA J R, et al. Modeling and qualitative experiments on swirling bubbly flows:single bubble with Rossby number of order 1[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2003, 125(2):239-246.
[10]	BANNWART A C. Modeling aspects of oil-water core-annular flows[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 2001, 32(2/3/4):127-143.
[11]	KATAOKA H, TOMIYAMA A, HOSOKAWA S, et al. Two-phase swirling flow in a gas-liquid separator[J]. Journal of Power & Energy Systems, 2008, 2(4):1120-1131.
[12]	KATAOKA H, SHINKAI Y, TOMIYAMA A. Effects of swirler shape on two-phase swirling flow in a steam separator[J]. Journal of Power & Energy Systems, 2009, 3(3):347-355.
[13]	KATAOKA H, TOMIYAMA A, HOSOKAWA S, et al. Effects of pick-off-ring configuration on separation performance of a gas-liquid separator[J]. Progress in Multiphase Flow Research, 2008, 3:67-74.
[14]	KATAOKA H, SHINKAI Y, HOSOKAWA S, et al. Swirling annular flow in a steam separator[C]//16th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.2009:67-74.
[15]	KITAGAWA A, HAGIWARA Y, KOUDA T. PTV investigation of phase interaction in dispersed liquid-liquid two-phase turbulent swirling flow[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2007, 42(6):871-880.
[16]	YANG Y, WANG D, NIU P M, et al. Gas-liquid two-phase flow measurements by the electromagnetic flowmeter combined with a phase-isolation method[J]. Flow Measurement & Instrumentation, 2018, 60:78-87.
[17]	SWANBORN R A. A new approach to the design of gas-liquid separators for the oil industry[D]. Delft:Technische Universiteit Delft, 1988.
[18]	LIN Q Y, LIN J Y, LIN R D, et al. Study on the rotating speed of self-rotating twisted tape inserted tubes[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2007, 18 (16):1970-1973.
[19]	蔡圃, 王博. 水力旋流器内非牛顿流体多相流场的数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(11):3460-3469. CAI P, WANG B. Numerical simulation of multiphase flow field of non-Newtonian fluid in hydrocyclone[J]. CIESC Journal, 2012, 63(11):3460-3469.
[20]	李群松, 陈东旭, 向寓华, 等. 传热管内结晶盐螺旋自转保洁技术试验研究[J]. 热科学与技术, 2008, 7(3):217-220. LI Q S, CHEN D X, XIANG Y H, et al. Crystallized salty in heat transfer tube spiral rotation cleaning technology study[J]. Journal of Thermal Science & Technology, 2008, 7(3):217-220.
[21]	ZHAO L, LI F, MA Z, et al. Theoretical analysis and experimental study of dynamic hydrocyclones[C]//ASME 2007, International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. 2007, 132(4):331-338.
[22]	王池, 王自和, 张宝珠, 等. 流量测量技术全书[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2012. WANG C, WANG Z H, ZHANG B Z, et al. Flow Measurement Technique Handbook[M]. Beijing:Chemical Industry Press, 2012.
[23]	SILVA F S, VELAZQUEZ M T, HERNANDEZ J R. Experimental study for the use of elbows as flowmeters[J]. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 1999, 21(2):185-185.
[24]	QIU X B. The simple economic elbow meter for flow measurement[J]. Measurement & Control, 1993, 26(8):245-246.
[25]	LI Z, WANG C. A research on standardization of elbow flow meters[J]. Journal of Hebei Institute of Technology, 2004, 26(4):19-23.
[26]	XING L C, GENG Y F, HUA C Q, et al. A combination method for metering gas-liquid two-phase flows of low liquid loading applying ultrasonic and Coriolis flowmeters[J]. Flow Measurement & Instrumentation, 2014, 37:135-143.
[27]	LI Y X, WANG J, GENG Y F. Study on wet gas online flow rate measurement based on dual slotted orifice plate[J]. Flow Measurement & Instrumentation, 2009, 20(4/5):168-173.
[28]	SUN Z. Mass flow measurement of gas-liquid bubble flow with the combined use of a Venturi tube and a vortex flowmeter[J]. Measurement Science & Technology, 2010, 21(5):055403.
[29]	HUA C, GENG Y F. Wet gas metering technique based on slotted orifice and swirlmeter in series[J]. Flow Measurement & Instrumentation, 2013, 30(6):138-143.
[30]	HONG K C, GRISTON S. Best practice for the distribution and metering of two-phase steam[J]. SPE Production & Facilities, 1997, 12(3):173-180.
[31]	YAMAZAKI S, FUNAKI T, KAWASHIMA K, et al. A concentration measurement system for binary gas mixtures using two flowmeters[J]. Measurement Science & Technology, 2007, 18(18):2762.
[32]	FINNEMORE E J, FRANZINI J B. Fluid Mechanics with Engineering Applications[M]. 10th ed. New York:McGraw-Hill, 2003:192-198.

基于管内相分隔的径向压差在多相流测量的应用

Radial differential pressure used in multiphase flow metering based on phase-isolation

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋瑞涛, 王派, 王云鹏, 李敏霞, 党超镔, 陈振国, 童欢, 周佳琦. 二氧化碳直接蒸发冰场排管内流动沸腾换热数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 96-103.
[2]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[3]	董明, 徐进良, 刘广林. 超临界水非均质特性分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2836-2847.
[4]	郑志航, 马郡男, 闫子涵, 卢春喜. 提升管射流影响区内压力脉动特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2335-2350.
[5]	颜少航, 赖天伟, 王彦武, 侯予, 陈双涛. 微间隙内R134a空化可视化实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1054-1061.
[6]	李新亚, 邢雷, 蒋明虎, 赵立新. 倒锥注气强化井下油水分离水力旋流器性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1134-1144.
[7]	章承浩, 罗京, 张吉松. 微反应器内基于氮氧自由基催化剂连续氧气/空气氧化反应的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 511-524.
[8]	熊昊, 梁潇予, 张晨曦, 白浩隆, 范晓宇, 魏飞. 重质油直接制化工品：多级逆流下行催化裂解技术[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 86-104.
[9]	范小强, 黄正梁, 孙婧元, 王靖岱, 王晓飞, 胡晓波, 韩国栋, 阳永荣, 吴文清. 气液法流化床乙烯云聚合工艺开发及产品高性能化[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2742-2747.
[10]	李铁男, 赵碧丹, 赵鹏, 张永民, 王军武. 气固流化床启动阶段挡板内构件受力特性的CFD-DEM模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2649-2661.
[11]	孔令菲, 陈延佩, 王维. 气固流态化中颗粒介尺度结构的动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2486-2495.
[12]	刘梦溪, 范怡平, 闫子涵, 姚秀颖, 卢春喜. 提升管进料区内气体射流流动行为的调控及工业应用[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2496-2513.
[13]	管小平, 杨宁. 基于介尺度稳定性条件的多相流曳力与群体平衡模型[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2427-2437.
[14]	兰文杰, 胡晓洁, 蔡迪宗. 界面探针法测量液滴与固体壁面间相互作用力[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(3): 1119-1126.
[15]	徐祖良, 汪宇昊, 赵辉, 周骛, 蔡小舒, 刘海峰. 同轴四通道喷嘴气流式雾化特性影响因素研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(2): 604-611.