化工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (9): 3859-3868.doi: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180450

• 催化、动力学与反应器 • 上一篇    下一篇


陈亮, 赵帆, 闫广精, 王春波   

  1. 华北电力大学能源动力与机械工程学院, 河北 保定 071003
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-26 修回日期:2018-06-11
  • 通讯作者: 陈亮 E-mail:c211205@163.com
  • 基金资助:


Synergetic effect of H2O and SO2 on calcination kinetics of limestone during simultaneous calcination/sulfation reaction in CFB boilers

CHEN Liang, ZHAO Fan, YAN Guangjing, WANG Chunbo   

  1. School of Energy and Power Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, Hebei, China
  • Received:2018-04-26 Revised:2018-06-11
  • Supported by:

    supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFB0600701) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2018ZD03).


采用自制恒温热重分析仪,研究了CFB工况下石灰石同时煅烧/硫化反应中H2O和SO2对石灰石煅烧动力学和孔结构的协同作用。煅烧环境中的H2O能够促进石灰石的分解,但SO2会减慢石灰石分解速度,且测试发现SO2使煅烧后颗粒的孔容积下降,分解反应的效率因子减小。基于此提出SO2减缓煅烧反应的机理:高温下,石灰石颗粒外层首先分解并生成多孔CaO层,其中的孔隙作为内部CaCO3分解产生CO2的外扩散通道,当煅烧气氛中含有SO2时,颗粒的CaO层与SO2反应生成CaSO4,堵塞了CaO中的孔隙,增加了CO2扩散的阻力,从而减缓了其分解速度。当石灰石在含有15% H2O和0.3% SO2的环境中分解时,其分解速度比不含二者的环境下快,而比含15% H2O但不含SO2的环境下慢,说明H2O和SO2对改变石灰石分解的速度有协同效应,但15% H2O的作用比0.3% SO2的作用更大。对效率因子的计算表明,该现象可能由于石灰石煅烧反应的速度控制步骤中本征反应速度的影响比扩散阻力的作用更大,而H2O能够直接加速煅烧反应的本征速度。温度、粒径等均能够影响石灰石同时煅烧/硫化反应的中的煅烧速度。H2O还能够促进CaO的烧结,并且H2O和SO2在降低石灰石煅烧产物的孔面积和孔容积上具有叠加效应。

关键词: 吸附剂, 动力学, 循环流化床, 石灰石, 煅烧, 硫化, 孔结构, H2O


The simultaneous calcination/sulfation reaction is the real reaction process of limestone in circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boiler. To obtain the true calcination process of limestone in CFB, the combined effect of H2O and SO2 on the calcination kinetics and pore structure of limestone during simultaneous calcination/sulfation reaction under CFB conditions was studied in a constant-temperature reactor. H2O (0-15%) can accelerate the calcination of CaCO3. The SO2 in flue gas decreased the calcination rate of limestone particles. This phenomenon was explained by a mechanism based on the measurement of pore structure, namely that SO2 reacted with CaO layer, and the formed CaSO4 would fill or block the pore in CaO layer, decrease the pore volume, increase the diffusion resistance of CO2, and consequently impede the calcination reaction. H2O and SO2 can work synergistically on changing the calcination rate,and an increase of the calcination rate was found under 15% H2O and 0.3% SO2 compared to that without either. This may be because intrinsic reaction played a major role in the rate controlling step of calcination, and H2O accelerated the intrinsic calcination directly. The effect of other factors like temperature and particle size on the calcination rate in the presence of H2O and SO2 were also tested. H2O also accelerated the sintering of CaO significantly, and along with SO2, the pore volume and surface area of CaO decreased further.

Key words: sorbents, kinetics, circulating fluidized bed, limestone, calcination, sulfation, pore structure, H2O


  • TK221

[1] 宋畅, 杨海瑞, 吕俊复, 等. 超临界及超超临界循环流化床锅炉技术研究与应用[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38(2):338-349. SONG C, YANG H R, LÜ J F, et al. Research and application of supercritical and ultra-supercritical circulating fluidized bed boiler technology[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38(2):338-349.
[2] 许霖杰, 程乐鸣, 邹阳军, 等. 1000MW超临界循环流化床锅炉环形炉膛气固流动特性数值模拟[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2015, 35(10):2480-2486. XU L J, CHENG L M, ZHOU Y J, et al. Numerical study of gas-solids flow characteristics in a 1000MW supercritical CFB boiler octagonal furnace[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2015, 35(10):2480-2486.
[3] ANTHONY E J, GRANATSTEIN D L. Sulfation phenomena in fluidized bed combustion systems[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2001, 27(2):215-236.
[4] MAHULI S K, AGNIHOTRI R, JADHAV R, et al. Combined calcination, sintering and sulfation model for CaCO3-SO2 reaction[J]. AIChE Journal, 1999, 45(2):367-382.
[5] 刘现卓, 赵长遂, 陈传敏, 等. O2/CO2气氛下石灰石煅烧及烧结特性研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2006, 27(5):891-893. LIU X Z, ZHAO Z S, CHEN C M, et al. The investigation on characteristics of calcination and sintering of limestone in O2/CO2 atmosphere[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2006, 27(5):891-893.
[6] 尚建宇, 王松岭, 王春波, 等. 煅烧石灰石过程中团聚体颗粒内的晶粒融合现象分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2010, 30(14):44-49. SHANG J Y, WANG S L, WANG C B, et al. The grain amalgamation phenomenon and its influence within calcination limestone aggregate particle[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2010, 30(14):44-49.
[7] 陈鸿伟, 陈江涛, 危日光, 等. 石灰石分解特性及微观结构迁移规律研究[J]. 热能动力工程, 2013, 28(1):73-77. CHEN H W, CHEN J T, WEI R G, et al. Study of the decomposition characteristics of limestone and the law governing the migration of the microscopic structure[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2013, 28(1):73-77.
[8] BORGWARDT R H. Calcination kinetics and surface area of dispersed limestone particles[J]. AIChE Journal 1985, 31(1):103-111.
[9] AR ?, DO?U G. Calcination kinetics of high purity limestones[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2001, 83(2):131-137.
[10] GARCÍA-LABIANO F, ABAD A, DE DIEGO L F, et al. Calcination of calcium-based sorbents at pressure in a broad range of CO2 concentrations[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2002, 57(13):2381-2393.
[11] KHINAST J, KRAMMER G F, BRUNNER C, et al. Decomposition of limestone:the influence of CO2 and particle size on the reaction rate[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1996, 51(4):623-634.
[12] DARROUDI T, SEARCY A W. Effect of CO2 pressure on the rate of decomposition of calcite[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1981, 85(26):3971-3974.
[13] WANG C, ZHANG Y, JIA L, et al. Effect of water vapor on the pore structure and sulfation of CaO[J]. Fuel, 2014, 130:60-65.
[14] WANG H, GUO S, LIU D, et al. A dynamic study on the impacts of water vapor and impurities on limestone calcination and CaO sulfurization processes in a microfluidized bed reactor analyzer[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30(6):4625-4634.
[15] WANG Y, THOMSON W J. The effects of steam and carbon dioxide on calcite decomposition using dynamic X-ray diffraction[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1995, 50(9):1373-1382.
[16] 梁占刚, 何榕, 陈群, 等. CaO高温脱硫过程数值计算[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2005, 25(19):71-74. LIANG Z G, HE R, CHEN Q, et al. Numerical simulation of desulfurization process with CaO at high temperature[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2005, 25(19):71-74.
[17] BORGWARDT R H, BRUCE K R. Effect of specific surface area on the reactivity of CaO with SO2[J]. AIChE Journal, 1986, 32(2):239-246.
[18] 姜中孝, 段伦博, 陈晓平, 等. 空气燃烧与O2/CO2燃烧气氛下水蒸气对石灰石煅烧/硫化特性的影响[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2013, 33(26):14-20. JIANG Z X, DUAN L B, CHEN X P, et al. Effect of water vapor on indirect sulfation during air and O2/CO2 combustion[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33(26):14-20.
[19] WANG C, JIA L, TAN Y, et al. The effect of water on the sulphation of limestone[J]. Fuel, 2010, 89(9):2628-2632.
[20] DUAN L, JIANG Z, CHEN X, et al. Investigation on water vapor effect on direct sulfation during wet-recycle oxy-coal combustion[J]. Applied Energy, 2013, 108(8):121-127.
[21] STEWART M C, MANOVIC V, ANTHONY E J, et al. Enhancement of indirect sulphation of limestone by steam addition[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(22):8781-8786.
[22] WANG C, CHEN L, JIA L, et al. Simultaneous calcination and sulfation of limestone in CFBB[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 155:478-484.
[23] 何宏舟, 邹峥, 俞金树, 等. 循环流化床锅炉燃烧福建无烟煤炉内脱硫的工业试验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2010, 30(35):7-12. HE H Z, ZOU Z, YU J S, et al. An industrial experiment research on the desulfurization of circulating fluidized bed boiler burning Fujian anthracite[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2010, 30(35):7-12.
[24] HU G, DAM-JOHANSEN K, WEDEL S, et al. Review of the direct sulfation reaction of limestone[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2006, 32(4):386-407.
[25] JEONG S, LEE K S, KEEL S I, et al. Mechanisms of direct and in-direct sulfation of limestone[J]. Fuel, 2015, 161:1-11.
[26] 陈亮, 王子铭, 王春波. 流化床锅炉内石灰石同时煅烧/硫化反应中煅烧动力学特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12):4615-4624. CHEN L, WANG Z M, WANG C B. Limestone calcination kinetics in simultaneous calcination and sulfation under CFB conditions[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(12):4615-4624.
[27] WANG C, CHEN L. The effect of steam on simultaneous calcination and sulfation of limestone in CFBB[J]. Fuel, 2016, 175:164-171.
[28] CHEN L, WANG C, WANG Z, et al. The kinetics and pore structure of sorbents during the simultaneous calcination/sulfation of limestone in CFB[J]. Fuel, 2017, 208:203-213.
[29] BHATIA S K, PERLMUTTER D D. A random pore model for fluid-solid reactions(Ⅱ):Diffusion and transport effects[J]. AIChE Journal, 1981, 27(2):247-254.
[30] FULLER E N, SCHETTLER P D, GIDDINGS J C. New method for prediction of binary gas-phase diffusion coefficients[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 1966, 58(5):18-27.
[31] FOGLER H S. Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering[M]. New York:Prentice Hall PTR, 2006.

[1] 李德生, 张超, 邓时海, 胡智丰, 李金龙, 刘元辉. 基于铁基质高效催化还原污水中硝酸盐氮的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(3): 1065-1074.
[2] 周雪冰, 刘婵娟, 罗金琼, 梁德青. 甲烷水合物分解过程的微尺度测量[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(3): 1042-1047.
[3] 李龙, 葛天舒, 吴宣楠, 代彦军. 硅胶嵌入多孔纸基对苯蒸气吸附性能[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(3): 951-959.
[4] 叶贞成, 周换兰, 饶德宝. 乙炔加氢反应过程混合建模与优化[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(2): 496-507.
[5] 薛永飞, 王雅琳, 孙备, 李钱钟, 孙家舟. 基于改进状态转移算法的串级平推流反应器动力学参数估计[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(2): 607-616.
[6] 邓伟峰, 蒋珍华, 刘少帅, 张安阔, 吴亦农. 高温区大冷量脉管制冷机优化设计与实验特性[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(1): 107-115.
[7] 丁炯, 陈琪, 许启跃, 杨遂军, 叶树亮. 融合C80数据的绝热加速量热法热惯量因子修正[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(1): 417-424.
[8] 陆念慈, 王瑞祥, 马庆阳. 不同载荷下瞬态放汽过程特性仿真[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 283-290.
[9] 王鑫, 杨斌鑫. 耦合格子Boltzmann的聚合物结晶相场方法[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 193-199.
[10] 陆繁莉, 葛天舒, 代彦军, 王如竹. 新型半解耦式除湿热泵系统的降温除湿性能[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 55-60.
[11] 薛超, 毛岩鹏, 王文龙, 宋占龙, 赵希强, 孙静, 王延相. 高压下微波催化湿式氧化技术降解苯酚类废水[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 210-217.
[12] 邹慧明, 李旋, 唐明生, 邵双全, 田长青. R290工质直线压缩机的性能实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 480-484.
[13] 许嘉兴, 晁京伟, 李廷贤, 王如竹. 膨胀石墨/有机金属骨架复合吸附材料的制备及性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 492-499.
[14] 赵海谦, 董明, 汪怀远, 刘立君, 李栋, 刘晓燕. 不同尺寸反应器内H2O2热分解氧化NO特性与氧化产物分析[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(9): 4037-4043.
[15] 贾晓霞, 王丽, 元宁, 杨江峰, 李晋平. 二价铬/钼/镍空配位MOFs的CH4/N2吸附分离研究[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(9): 3896-3904.
Full text



No Suggested Reading articles found!