基于DOC+SCR的船用柴油机尾气污染物脱除实验

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20171600

化工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (7): 3249-3256.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20171600

基于DOC+SCR的船用柴油机尾气污染物脱除实验

汪宗御, 邝海浪, 张继锋, 纪玉龙

大连海事大学轮机工程学院, 辽宁大连 116026

收稿日期:2017-12-04 修回日期:2018-02-11 出版日期:2018-07-05 发布日期:2018-07-05
通讯作者: 纪玉龙
基金资助:
交通运输部应用基础研究（2015329225070）；辽宁省自然科学基金项目（201602095）；中央高校基本科研业务费（3132016340）；归国留学人员科技活动项目择优资助（人社厅函[2014]240号）。

Removal of marine diesel engine exhaust pollutants with DOC+SCR technologies

WANG Zongyu, KUANG Hailang, ZHANG Jifeng, JI Yulong

College of Marine Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, Liaoning, China

Received:2017-12-04 Revised:2018-02-11 Online:2018-07-05 Published:2018-07-05
Supported by:
supported by the Applied Basic Research Programs of Ministry of Transport of China (2015329225070), Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (201602095), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (3132016340), Selected Scientific and Technological Activities Fund for Returned Overseas Students (Human Resources Agency[2014] No. 240).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在发电柴油机台架上，通过SMG 100颗粒分析仪、Testo 350烟气分析仪等设备测试了加装DOC和SCR后柴油机在额定转速时6个工况点的排放特性，分析了DOC对CO、NO_x和PM的影响，以及不同功率和喷氨量时SCR的脱硝率。结果表明，温度对DOC影响很大，当温度高于250℃，CO的脱除率在96%以上。在中低负荷时，DOC对PM的质量浓度脱除率在76%以上，但在满负荷时，由于柴油机燃烧快速恶化，PM浓度快速增大，此时的PM脱除率仅为36%。DOC能将NO转化为NO₂，但对NO_x的总浓度几乎不产生影响。SCR受温度和氨氮比的影响比较大，当温度高于250℃，氨氮比为1时，脱硝率几乎达到100%。通过与多篇文献的对比分析，采用功率与催化剂体积之比作为钒基SCR的初期选型参数可能更加合适。

关键词: 柴油氧化催化器, 选择催化还原, 催化剂, 颗粒物, 一氧化碳, 氮氧化物, 氨氮比

Abstract:

The emission characteristics of DOC and SCR were tested by SMG 100 particle analyzer and Testo 350 flue gas analyzer on a diesel generator bench. Six working points were tested at rated speed. The effects of DOC on CO, NO_x and PM were analyzed. The denitrification rates of SCR at different power points and urea injection were investigated. The results showed that DOC was greatly affected by temperature. CO removal rate was above 96% when the temperature was higher than 250℃. PM removal rate was above 76% at low or medium load. However, the PM removal rate was only 36% at full load because the PM concentration increased rapidly due to the rapid deterioration of diesel combustion. DOC could convert NO to NO₂, but it had little effect on the total concentration of NO_x. The denitrification rate of SCR was closely related to temperature and NH₃/NO_x ratio. It was almost 100% when the temperature was higher than 250℃ and NH₃/NO_x=1. Through the comparison with many articles, it may be more appropriate to use power/catalyst volume as the initial selection parameter for the vanadium-based SCR.

Key words: DOC, SCR, catalyst, PM, CO, NO_x, NH₃/NO_x ratio

中图分类号:

X511

汪宗御, 邝海浪, 张继锋, 纪玉龙. 基于DOC+SCR的船用柴油机尾气污染物脱除实验[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(7): 3249-3256.

WANG Zongyu, KUANG Hailang, ZHANG Jifeng, JI Yulong. Removal of marine diesel engine exhaust pollutants with DOC+SCR technologies[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(7): 3249-3256.

参考文献 31

[1]	CHEN G J, LIU Z M, LIU T T, et al. Research on emission control of marine diesel engine[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 430/431/432:1198-1202.
[2]	YOO D H, NITTA Y, IKAME M, et al. Exhaust characteristics of nitrous oxide from marine engine[C]//2012 Oceans.Yeosu, 2012.
[3]	方平, 陈雄波, 唐子君, 等. 船舶柴油机大气污染物排放特性及控制技术研究现状[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(3):1067-1076. FANG P, CHEN X B, TANG Z J, et al. Current research status on air pollutant emission characteristics and control technology of marine diesel engine[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(3):1067-1076.
[4]	IMO. Resolution MEPC. 203(62)-Amendments to MARPOL Annex VI on regulations for the prevention of air pollution from ships by inclusion of new regulations on energy efficiency for ships[S]. 2011.
[5]	MAN Diesel & Turbo. MAN Diesel & Turbo delivers World's first IMO certified two-stroke engine with Tier Ⅲ NOx control, exhaust gas recirculation systems[EB/OL].[2017-11-17]. http://www.corporate.man.eu/en/press-and-media/presscenter/MAN-Diesel-and-Turbo-DeliversWorld's-First-IMO-Certified-Two-Stroke-Engine-with-Tier-Ⅲ-NOxControl_-Exhaust-Gas-Recirculation-Systems-241408.html.
[6]	MAN Diesel & Turbo. MAN B&W two-stroke marine engines emission project guide for Marpol Annex VI regulations[EB/OL].[2017-11-17]. http://marine.man.eu/applications/projectguides/2stroke/content/special_pg/7020-0145_uk.pdf.
[7]	陈贵升, 马帅营, 毛斌, 等. 基于EGR技术的低排放重型柴油机燃烧系统开发[J]. 内燃机学报, 2013, 31(4):309-317. CHEN G S, MA S Y, MAO B, et al. Development of combustion system of a low-emission heavy-duty diesel engine with EGR[J]. Transactions of CSICE, 2013, 31(4):309-317.
[8]	HSIEH M F, WANG J. Development and experimental studies of a control-oriented SCR model for a two-catalyst urea-SCR system[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2011, 19(4):409-422.
[9]	BRANDENBERGER S, KROCHER O, TISSLER A, et al. The determination of the activities of different iron species in Fe-ZSM-5 for SCR of NO by NH3[J]. Applied Catalysis B:Environmental, 2010, 95(3):348-357.
[10]	COLOMBO M, NOVA I, TRONCONI E. Detailed kinetic modeling of the NH3-NO/NO2 SCR reactions over a commercial Cu-zeolite catalyst for diesel exhausts after treatment[J]. Catalysis Today, 2012, 197(1):243-255.
[11]	SJOVALL H, OLSSON L, FRIDELL E, et al. Selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 over Cu-ZSM-5-the effect of changing the gas composition[J]. Applied Catalysis B:Environmental, 2006, 64(3):180-188.
[12]	JUNG Y J, SHIN Y J, PYO Y D, et al. NOx and N2O emissions over a urea-SCR system containing both V2O5-WO3/TiO2 and Cu-zeolite catalysts in a diesel engine[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 326:853-862.
[13]	NOVA I, TRONCONI E. Urea-SCR Technology for deNOx After Treatment of Diesel Exhausts[M]. New York:Springer Verlag, 2014.
[14]	BAI S Z, WANG G H, LIU Y, et al. Experimental study on emission characteristics of non-electronic control diesel engine with DOC/POC/SCR combined system[J]. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 2017, 26(2a):1359-1364.
[15]	辛喆, 张寅, 王顺喜, 等. 柴油机Urea-SCR催化器转化效率影响因素研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2011, 42(9):30-34. XIN Z, ZHANG Y, WANG S X, et al. Influence factors of DeNOx behavior in urea-SCR catalytic converter of diesel[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2011, 42(9):30-34.
[16]	HENRIKSSON T. SOx scrubbing of marine exhaust gas[J]. Wärtsilä Technical Journal, 2007, (2):55-58.
[17]	IMO. IMO sets 2020 date for ships to comply with low sulphur fuel oil requirement[EB/OL].[2017-11-17]. http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/MEPC-70-2020sulphur.aspx.
[18]	CALISKAN H, MORI K. Environmental, enviroeconomic and enhanced thermodynamic analyses of a diesel engine with diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) and diesel particulate filter (DPF) after treatment systems[J]. Energy, 2017, 128:128-144.
[19]	YE S, YAP Y H, KOLACZKOWSKI S T, et al. Catalyst ‘light-off’ experiments on a diesel oxidation catalyst connected to a diesel engine-methodology and techniques[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2012, 90(6):834-845.
[20]	郑尊清, 尧命发, 高俊华, 等. 采用VNT/EGR和DOC降低柴油机排放的试验[J]. 内燃机学报, 2010, 28(4):289-296. ZHENG Z Q, YAO M F, GAO J H, et al. Experimental on reduction of diesel emissions by VNT/EGR and diesel oxidation catalyst[J]. Transactions of CSICE, 2010, 28(4):289-296.
[21]	黄海凤, 陈晓, 顾蕾, 等. 柴油车DOC催化剂Pt/CeZrO2载体的制备及影响[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(4):1390-1397. HUANG H F, CHEN X, GU L, et al. Preparation and effect of Pt/CeZrO2 diesel oxidation catalysts support[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(4):1390-1397.
[22]	赵彦光, 华伦, 胡静, 等. 柴油机SCR系统尿素溶液喷雾特性的试验研究[J]. 内燃机工程, 2012, 33(4):22-27. ZHAO Y G, HUA L, HU J, et al. Experimental study of urea solution spray characteristics in SCR system of diesel engine[J]. Chinese Internal Combustion Engine Engineering, 2012, 33(4):22-27.
[23]	刘福东, 单文坡, 石晓燕, 等. 用于NH3选择性催化还原NOx的钒基催化剂[J]. 化学进展, 2012, 24(4):445-455. LIU F D, SHAN W P, SHI X Y, et al. Vanadium-based catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2012, 24(4):445-455.
[24]	吕洪坤, 杨卫娟, 周俊虎, 等. 尿素溶液高温热分解特性的实验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2010, 30(17):35-40. LÜ H K, YANG W J, ZHOU J H, et al. Investigation on thermal decomposition characteristics of urea solution under high temperature[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2010, 30(17):35-40.
[25]	张向宇, 张波, 陆续, 等. 火电厂尿素水解工艺设计及试验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(9):2452-2458. ZHANG X Y, ZHANG B, LU X, et al. Crafts design and experimental study of urea hydrolysis to ammonia in thermal power plant[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(9):2452-2458.
[26]	唐韬, 赵彦光, 华伦, 等. 柴油机SCR系统尿素水溶液喷雾分解的试验研究[J]. 内燃机工程, 2015, 36(1):1-5. TANG T, ZHAO Y G, HUA L, et al. Experimental study of urea solution spray and decomposition of SCR system for diesel engine[J]. Chinese Internal Combustion Engine Engineering, 2015, 36(1):1-5.
[27]	胡静, 赵彦光, 陈婷, 等. 重型柴油机尿素SCR后处理系统的控制策略研究[J]. 内燃机工程, 2011, 32(2):1-5. HU J, ZHAO Y G, CHEN T, et al. Study of control strategy for ureaSCR after-treatment system of heavy duty diesel engine[J]. Chinese Internal Combustion Engine Engineering, 2011, 32(2):1-5.
[28]	王静, 王谦, 徐航, 等. 车用柴油机SCR系统NOx转化效率影响因素[J]. 内燃机学报, 2015, 33(5):453-460. WANG J, WANG Q, XU H, et al. Influential factors on NOx conversion efficiency of vehicle SCR system[J]. Transactions of CSICE, 2015, 33(5):453-460.
[29]	刘洋, 孙亮, 白书战, 等. DOC/POC/SCR组合后处理技术在非电控柴油机排放上的应用研究[J]. 内燃机工程, 2015, 36(1):18-22. LIU Y, SUN L, BAI S Z, et al. Study on emission characteristics of non-electronically controlled diesel engine with DOC/POC/SCR combined system[J]. Chinese Internal Combustion Engine Engineering, 2015, 36(1):18-22.
[30]	刘传宝, 颜伏伍, 胡杰, 等. 柴油机SCR后处理系统控制策略[J]. 农业机械学报, 2013, 44(11):6-11. LIU C B, YAN F W, HU J, et al. SCR post-processing system control strategy of diesel engine[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2013, 44(11):6-11.
[31]	姜磊, 葛蕴珊, 丁焰, 等. 柴油机尿素SCR系统稳态及瞬态特性研究[J]. 内燃机工程, 2010, 31(6):38-42. JIANG L, GE Y S, DING Y, et al. Study on steady and transient characteristics of urea-SCR system for diesel engine[J]. Chinese Internal Combustion Engine Engineering, 2010, 31(6):38-42.

基于DOC+SCR的船用柴油机尾气污染物脱除实验

Removal of marine diesel engine exhaust pollutants with DOC+SCR technologies

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[2]	陈杰, 林永胜, 肖恺, 杨臣, 邱挺. 胆碱基碱性离子液体催化合成仲丁醇性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3716-3730.
[3]	杨学金, 杨金涛, 宁平, 王访, 宋晓双, 贾丽娟, 冯嘉予. 剧毒气体PH₃的干法净化技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3742-3755.
[4]	郑玉圆, 葛志伟, 韩翔宇, 王亮, 陈海生. 中高温钙基材料热化学储热的研究进展与展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3171-3192.
[5]	杨菲菲, 赵世熙, 周维, 倪中海. Sn掺杂的In₂O₃催化CO₂选择性加氢制甲醇[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3366-3374.
[6]	李凯旋, 谭伟, 张曼玉, 徐志豪, 王旭裕, 纪红兵. 富含零价钴活性位点的钴氮碳/活性炭设计及甲醛催化氧化应用研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3342-3352.
[7]	杨欣, 彭啸, 薛凯茹, 苏梦威, 吴燕. 分子印迹-TiO₂光电催化降解增溶PHE废水性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3564-3571.
[8]	余娅洁, 李静茹, 周树锋, 李清彪, 詹国武. 基于天然生物模板构建纳米材料及集成催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2735-2752.
[9]	李盼, 马俊洋, 陈志豪, 王丽, 郭耘. Ru/α-MnO₂催化剂形貌对NH₃-SCO反应性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2908-2918.
[10]	涂玉明, 邵高燕, 陈健杰, 刘凤, 田世超, 周智勇, 任钟旗. 钙基催化剂的设计合成及应用研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2717-2734.
[11]	张琦钰, 高利军, 苏宇航, 马晓博, 王翊丞, 张亚婷, 胡超. 碳基催化材料在电化学还原二氧化碳中的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2753-2772.
[12]	张希庆, 王琰婷, 徐彦红, 常淑玲, 孙婷婷, 薛定, 张立红. Mg量影响的纳米片负载Pt-In催化异丁烷脱氢性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2427-2435.
[13]	周继鹏, 何文军, 李涛. 异形催化剂上乙烯催化氧化失活动力学反应工程计算[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2416-2426.
[14]	张谭, 刘光, 李晋平, 孙予罕. Ru基氮还原电催化剂性能调控策略[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2264-2280.
[15]	王辰, 史秀锋, 武鲜凤, 魏方佳, 张昊虹, 车寅, 吴旭. 氧化还原法制备Mn₃O₄催化剂及其甲苯催化氧化性能与机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2447-2457.