生物质三组分二元混合热解特性研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20201876

化工学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 72 ›› Issue (7): 3788-3800.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20201876

生物质三组分二元混合热解特性研究

范洪刚^1,^2,³(),赵丹丹^1,^2,⁵,顾菁^1,²,王亚琢^1,²,袁浩然^1,^2,^4,⁵(),陈勇^1,^2,^4,⁵

^1.中国科学院广州能源研究所，广东广州 510640
^2.南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室（广州），广东广州 511458
^3.中国科学院大学，北京 100049
^4.厦门大学能源学院，福建厦门 361005
^5.同济大学机械与能源工程学院，上海 200092

收稿日期:2020-12-20 修回日期:2021-03-25 出版日期:2021-07-05 发布日期:2021-07-05
通讯作者: 袁浩然
作者简介:范洪刚（1993—）,男, 博士研究生, fanhg@ms.giec.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1901200);国家自然科学基金项目(51976223)

Study on the pyrolysis characteristics of binary mixture of biomass three-component

FAN Honggang^1,^2,³(),ZHAO Dandan^1,^2,⁵,GU Jing^1,²,WANG Yazhuo^1,²,YUAN Haoran^1,^2,^4,⁵(),CHEN Yong^1,^2,^4,⁵

^1.Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China
^2.Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, Guangdong, China
^3.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
^4.College of Energy, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, China
^5.School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received:2020-12-20 Revised:2021-03-25 Online:2021-07-05 Published:2021-07-05
Contact: YUAN Haoran

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用TG-FTIR-MS研究了生物质三组分二元混合热解过程的失重特性和小分子气体逸出规律。结果表明二元混合组分热解过程降低了热解反应开始温度。纤维素与半纤维素混合热解过程热解反应受到抑制，热解失重率降低，H₂、CH₄和H₂O产量减小，CO和CO₂产量增加。木质素和半纤维素在混合热解过程中存在协同效应，促进热解反应进行，H₂产量增加，然而其他小分子气体产物的生成被抑制，协同效应的效果更有利于可冷凝挥发分产物生成，这种效应随着半纤维素比例增大而减弱。半纤维素和纤维素在整个热解过程表现出相互抑制的效果，其小分子气体产物产量减小，但随着纤维素比例增大，影响减弱。

关键词: 生物质, 纤维素, 半纤维素, 木质素, 热解, 二元混合物, 协同效应

Abstract:

TG-FTIR-MS was used to study the mass loss characteristics and the evolution of small molecule gas during the pyrolysis of binary mixtures, which were mixed by biomass three-component. The results showed that the initial pyrolysis temperature decreased in the co-pyrolysis process. During the co-pyrolysis of cellulose and hemicellulose, the pyrolysis reaction was inhibited and the mass loss rate was reduced. Additionally, the yield of H₂, CH₄and H₂O decreased, while the yield of CO and CO₂ increased. Synergistic effect was found in the co-pyrolysis of lignin and hemicellulose, which promoted the pyrolysis reaction process. For the volatile products, the formation of H₂O was promoted and its yield increased, however, the production of other small molecule gas products was inhibited. This synergistic effect was mainly conducive to the formation of condensable volatile products. Moreover, this effect decreased as the proportion of hemicellulose increased. The entire pyrolysis process of hemicellulose and cellulose exhibited mutual inhibition effects, and the production of small molecule gas products decreased, but the influence decreased with the increase of cellulose ratio.

Key words: biomass, cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, pyrolysis, binary mixture, synergistic effect

中图分类号:

X 705

范洪刚, 赵丹丹, 顾菁, 王亚琢, 袁浩然, 陈勇. 生物质三组分二元混合热解特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(7): 3788-3800.

FAN Honggang, ZHAO Dandan, GU Jing, WANG Yazhuo, YUAN Haoran, CHEN Yong. Study on the pyrolysis characteristics of binary mixture of biomass three-component[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(7): 3788-3800.

图/表 9

表1 生物质三组分的工业分析和元素分析

Table 1 Proximate analysis and ultimate analysis of biomass three-component

样品	工业分析/%			元素分析/%
样品	挥发分	灰分	固定碳	C	H	N	O^①
CE	91.26	0.16	8.58	42.88	6.47	0.03	50.46
XY	96.62	0.27	3.11	42.55	6.53	0.05	50.60
LG	45.47	16.83	37.7	50.08	4.96	0.00	28.13

图1 样品热失重TG和DTG曲线

Fig.1 TG and DTG curves of samples

表2 样品的热失重特征点

Table 2 Thermal mass loss characteristics of samples

样品	T_s/℃	T_max/℃	T_e/℃	D_max/ (%/min)	热解残留/%
CE	264.50	347.52	414.63	92.27	11.81
CELG-31	189.07	322.76	528.59	24.16	25.38
CELG-11	186.26	321.14	529.24	17.98	32.63
CELG-13	180.60	315.53	529.03	11.46	39.21
LG	221.08	321.14	541.01	9.31	51.73
LGXY-31	172.92	192.67	533.76	29.99	40.33
LGXY-11	164.92	185.7	531.75	91.66	31.58
LGXY-13	174.14	197.21	531.99	179.96	25.49
XY	201.55	265.03	329.68	78.23	15.82
XYCE-31	202.06	300.09	388.13	25.89	19.29
XYCE-11	192.21	351.93	375.41	43.66	17.14
XYCE-13	193.94	350.81	377.25	58.13	14.18

图2 二元混合组分的实验和理论TG曲线以及热失重实验值和理论值差值

Fig.2 The experimental and theoretical TG curves of the binary mixture as well as the difference between the experimental and theoretical values of mass loss

图3 各样品红外谱图

Fig.3 FTIR spectra of samples

图4 生物质三组分单独热解小分子气体质谱谱图

Fig.4 Mass spectra of small molecule gas during the pyrolysis of biomass three-component

图5 纤维素和木质素混合热解小分子气体质谱曲线以及峰面积实验值与理论值对比

Fig.5 The MS curves of small molecule gas as well as the experimental and theoretical values of peak area during the co-pyrolysis of cellulose and lignin

图6 木质素和半纤维素混合热解小分子气体质谱曲线以及峰面积实验值与理论值对比

Fig.6 The MS curves of small molecule gas as well as the experimental and theoretical values of peak area during the co-pyrolysis of lignin and hemicellulose

图7 半纤维素和纤维素混合热解小分子气体质谱曲线以及峰面积实验值与理论值对比

Fig.7 The MS curves of small molecule gas as well as the experimental and theoretical values of peak area during the co-pyrolysis of hemicellulose and cellulose

参考文献 33

1	Sheldon R A. Green and sustainable manufacture of chemicals from biomass: state of the art[J]. Green Chemistry, 2014, 16(3): 950-963.
2	Zhang H Y, Luo M M, Xiao R, et al. Catalytic conversion of biomass pyrolysis-derived compounds with chemical liquid deposition (CLD) modified ZSM-5[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 155: 57-62.
3	Taarning E, Osmundsen C M, Yang X B, et al. Zeolite-catalyzed biomass conversion to fuels and chemicals[J]. Energy Environmental Science, 2011, 4(3): 793-804.
4	Chen X, Li S J, Liu Z H, et al. Pyrolysis characteristics of lignocellulosic biomass components in the presence of CaO[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 287: 121493.
5	Zeng K, Li J, Xie Y P, et al. Molten salt pyrolysis of biomass: the mechanism of volatile reforming and pyrolysis[J]. Energy, 2020, 213: 118801.
6	Wang S R, Dai G X, Yang H P, et al. Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis mechanism: a state-of-the-art review[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2017, 62: 33-86.
7	Pang C H, Gaddipatti S, Tucker G, et al. Relationship between thermal behaviour of lignocellulosic components and properties of biomass[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 172: 312-320.
8	Biagini E, Barontini F, Tognotti L. Devolatilization of biomass fuels and biomass components studied by TG/FTIR technique[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2006, 45(13): 4486-4493.
9	Yang H P, Yan R, Chen H P, et al. In-depth investigation of biomass pyrolysis based on three major components: hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2006, 20(1): 388-393.
10	Yu J, Paterson N, Blamey J, et al. Cellulose, xylan and lignin interactions during pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass[J]. Fuel, 2017, 191: 140-149.
11	Hilbers T J, Wang Z H, Pecha B, et al. Cellulose-lignin interactions during slow and fast pyrolysis[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2015, 114: 197-207.
12	Hosoya T, Kawamoto H, Saka S. Pyrolysis behaviors of wood and its constituent polymers at gasification temperature[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2007, 78(2): 328-336.
13	Couhert C, Commandre J M, Salvador S. Is it possible to predict gas yields of any biomass after rapid pyrolysis at high temperature from its composition in cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin?[J]. Fuel, 2009, 88(3): 408-417.
14	Zhang J, Choi Y S, Yoo C G, et al. Cellulose–hemicellulose and cellulose–lignin interactions during fast pyrolysis[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2015, 3(2): 293-301.
15	Wu S L, Shen D K, Hu J, et al. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2016, 95: 55-63.
16	Chua Y W, Wu H W, Yu Y. Effect of cellulose-lignin interactions on char structural changes during fast pyrolysis at 100—350℃[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2021, 38(3): 3977-3986.
17	Giudicianni P, Cardone G, Cellulose Ragucci R., hemicellulose and lignin slow steam pyrolysis: thermal decomposition of biomass components mixtures[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2013, 100: 213-222.
18	Wang S R, Lin H Z, Ru B, et al. Kinetic modeling of biomass components pyrolysis using a sequential and coupling method[J]. Fuel, 2016, 185: 763-771.
19	Wang S R, Ru B, Lin H Z, et al. Pyrolysis behaviors of four O-acetyl-preserved hemicelluloses isolated from hardwoods and softwoods[J]. Fuel, 2015, 150: 243-251.
20	Yang H Q, Yi N, Zhao S, et al. Characterization of hemicelluloses in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) culm during xylogenesis[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2020, 165: 1119-1128.
21	Collard F X, Blin J. A review on pyrolysis of biomass constituents: mechanisms and composition of the products obtained from the conversion of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 38: 594-608.
22	Chu S, Subrahmanyam A V, Huber G W. The pyrolysis chemistry of a β-O-4 type oligomeric lignin model compound[J]. Green Chemistry, 2013, 15(1): 125-136.
23	Milosavljevic I, Oja V, Suuberg E M. Thermal effects in cellulose pyrolysis: relationship to char formation processes[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1996, 35(3): 653-662.
24	Kai X P, Yang T H, Shen S Q, et al. TG-FTIR-MS study of synergistic effects during co-pyrolysis of corn stalk and high-density polyethylene (HDPE)[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 181: 202-213.
25	Kai X P, Li R D, Yang T H, et al. Study on the co-pyrolysis of rice straw and high density polyethylene blends using TG-FTIR-MS[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 146: 20-33.
26	Ma Z Q, Chen D Y, Gu J, et al. Determination of pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of palm kernel shell using TGA-FTIR and model-free integral methods[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 89: 251-259.
27	Peng X W, Ma X Q, Lin Y S, et al. Co-pyrolysis between microalgae and textile dyeing sludge by TG-FTIR: kinetics and products[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 100: 391-402.
28	Zeng L T, Hu X C, Gu N N, et al. Investigation of volatile chemicals and their distributions from pyrolysis of chitin by FT-IR and GC-MS[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2015, 112: 357-362.
29	Yuan H R, Fan H G, Shan R, et al. Study of synergistic effects during co-pyrolysis of cellulose and high-density polyethylene at various ratios[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 157: 517-526.
30	Gu J, Fan H G, Wang Y Z, et al. Co-pyrolysis of xylan and high-density polyethylene: product distribution and synergistic effects[J]. Fuel, 2020, 267: 116896.
31	Monteil-Rivera F, Phuong M, Ye M W, et al. Isolation and characterization of herbaceous lignins for applications in biomaterials[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2013, 41: 356-364.
32	Wang S R, Wang K G, Liu Q, et al. Comparison of the pyrolysis behavior of lignins from different tree species[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2009, 27(5): 562-567.
33	Asmadi M, Kawamoto H, Saka S. Thermal reactivities of catechols/pyrogallols and cresols/xylenols as lignin pyrolysis intermediates[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2011, 92(1): 76-87.

[1]	杨绍旗, 赵淑蘅, 陈伦刚, 王晨光, 胡建军, 周清, 马隆龙. Raney镍-质子型离子液体体系催化木质素平台分子加氢脱氧制备烷烃[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3697-3707.
[2]	车睿敏, 郑文秋, 王小宇, 李鑫, 许凤. 基于离子液体的纤维素均相加工研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3615-3627.
[3]	郑佳丽, 李志会, 赵新强, 王延吉. 离子液体催化合成2-氰基呋喃反应动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3708-3715.
[4]	吴雷, 刘姣, 李长聪, 周军, 叶干, 刘田田, 朱瑞玉, 张秋利, 宋永辉. 低阶粉煤催化微波热解制备含碳纳米管的高附加值改性兰炭末[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3956-3967.
[5]	陈佳起, 赵万玉, 姚睿充, 侯道林, 董社英. 开心果壳基碳点的合成及其对Q235碳钢的缓蚀行为研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3446-3456.
[6]	吴文涛, 褚良永, 张玲洁, 谭伟民, 沈丽明, 暴宁钟. 腰果酚生物基自愈合微胶囊的高效制备工艺研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3103-3115.
[7]	杨峥豪, 何臻, 常玉龙, 靳紫恒, 江霞. 生物质快速热解下行式流化床反应器研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2249-2263.
[8]	董茂林, 陈李栋, 黄六莲, 吴伟兵, 戴红旗, 卞辉洋. 酸性助水溶剂制备木质纳米纤维素及功能应用研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2281-2295.
[9]	龙臻, 王谨航, 任俊杰, 何勇, 周雪冰, 梁德青. 离子液体协同PVCap抑制天然气水合物生成实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2639-2646.
[10]	李靖, 沈聪浩, 郭大亮, 李静, 沙力争, 童欣. 木质素基碳纤维复合材料在储能元件中的应用研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2322-2334.
[11]	崔张宁, 胡紫璇, 吴雷, 周军, 叶干, 刘田田, 张秋利, 宋永辉. 可降解纤维素基材料的耐水性能研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2296-2307.
[12]	葛泽峰, 吴雨青, 曾名迅, 查振婷, 马宇娜, 侯增辉, 张会岩. 灰化学成分对生物质气化特性的影响规律[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2136-2146.
[13]	衣思敏, 马亚丽, 刘伟强, 张金帅, 岳岩, 郑强, 贾松岩, 李雪. 微晶菱镁矿蒸氨及水化动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1578-1586.
[14]	刘海芹, 李博文, 凌喆, 刘亮, 俞娟, 范一民, 勇强. 羟基-炔点击化学改性半乳甘露聚糖薄膜的制备及性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1370-1378.
[15]	陈瑞哲, 程磊磊, 顾菁, 袁浩然, 陈勇. 纤维增强树脂复合材料化学回收技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 981-994.

生物质三组分二元混合热解特性研究

Study on the pyrolysis characteristics of binary mixture of biomass three-component

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价